Cited by 52Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and DevelopmentSharing Economy and Platforms

Consumer decision-making on repair in a circular economy: A process model based on experiences among young adults and stakeholders in Finland

Open access
Korsunova, Angelina, Heiskanen, Eva, Vainio, Annukka·2023·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

The repair industry, consumer expenditure on repair and the number of repair businesses have been steadily decreasing in many European countries over the last 20–40 years. Our study focuses on consumer repair as a practice, with an emphasis on the interactions between propensity to repair, experience of repair and societal rules and structures that affect repair decisions in different phases of product lifetimes. Moreover, exploring the consumer repair process enables a nuanced understanding of the different paths leading to self-repair, professional repair or non-repair decisions. Drawing on past repair and non-repair experiences (n = 98) of young adults residing in Finland, we develop a consumer repair process model reflective of the individual perceptions, but also of the structural problems that enable or impede repair in the Finnish context. Further, we complement this data with semi-structured interviews of selected repair industry actors and representatives of the educational sector (n = 9), discussing interventions to encourage repair in business, legal and educational systems. The results highlight the role of consumer experience of repair and its situatedness in the shared cultural context, suggesting implications for institutionalizing experience of repair in primary education and other societal activities in order to enhance consumers’ propensity to repair. As a conclusion, we suggest that shifting societal perceptions and rhetoric around repair requires innovativ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137052

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korsunova, A., Heiskanen, E., & Vainio, A.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Korsunova, Angelina
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
405
Pages
137052
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362579545
Cited by
52
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Helsingin Yliopisto
  • HELSUS Kestävyystieteen Instituutti
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
Keywords
repair decision-making, circular economy, self-healing, repair cafés, young adults, primary education, inter-municipal cooperation, product lifetime, Finland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review