Cited by 54Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization

Well-to-wheels scenarios for 2050 carbon-neutral road transport in the EU

Open access
Krause, Jette, Yugo, Marta, Samaras, Zissis, Edwards, Simon, Fontaras, Georgios, Dauphin, Roland, Prenninger, Peter, Neugebauer, Stephan·2024·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

The present study explores net carbon-neutral road transport options in the EU27 in 2050 from a well-to-wheel (WtW) perspective. To this aim, three scenarios have been developed regarding the evolution of the road vehicle fleet composition in terms of the degree of electrification of powertrains, and technical measures such as vehicle efficiency improvements, transport flow, and transport volumes have been considered. The fleet scenarios are further combined with four scenarios deploying different mixes of alternative fuels in 2050, including electricity, e-fuels, liquid/gaseous advanced biofuels and remaining fossil fuel components. Two different electricity production pathways are considered, as well, one of them assuming fully renewable electricity production, and an alternative one including residual shares of nuclear and natural gas power plants plus carbon capture and storage. The Joint Research Centre's DIONE model was used for the scenario calculations. From a tank-to-wheel (TtW) perspective, each scenario reduces energy consumption, mainly due to powertrain electrification, with EU27 TtW road vehicle energy consumption in 2050 ranging from roughly 650 to 1650 TWh, which is 20%–53% of that of 2019. For the most strongly electrified fleet scenario with optimistic assumptions on measures to improve vehicle efficiency, transport flow and transport volumes and renewable electricity production, well-to-tank (WtT) energy consumption is around 110–160 TWh, depending on the fuel scenario. If a moderately electrified fleet is propelled with e-fuels, even when assuming fully renewable electricity and optimistic measures, the WtT energy consumption increases ten times or more, to 1300 TWh (2150 TWh with pessimistic measures). The results show that fleet electrification is the strongest lever for WtW transport energy consumption reduction among the options considered. Other efficiency measures contribute significantly to energy savings, but their benefit decreases with increasing fleet electrification. The production pathways of fuels make a substantial difference for WtW fleet energy requirement if the fleet is moderately electrified, in which case e-fuels require significant amounts of additional renewable electricity. Nevertheless, fuel production pathways become irrelevant from an energetic point of view under very ambitious electrification scenarios since fuel volumes become marginal. The economic feasibility and the societal acceptability of different pathways towards WtW carbon-neutrality of road transport is out of scope of this paper and requires further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141084

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liquid biofuels primarily serve as substitutes for conventional petroleum-derived fuels within the transportation sector, an area critically dependent on liquid hydrocarbons for over 90% of its energy needs and responsible for approximately 25% of global energy-related CO2 emissions.

    “Liquid biofuels primarily serve as substitutes for conventional petroleum-derived fuels within the transportation sector [12,38], an area critically dependent on liquid hydrocarbons for over 90% of its energy needs [17] and responsible for approximately 25% of global energy-related CO 2 emissions [13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krause, J., Yugo, M., Samaras, Z., Edwards, S., Fontaras, G., Dauphin, R., Prenninger, P., & Neugebauer, S.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • Concawe (BE)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Anstalt für Verbrennungskraftmaschinen List (Austria) (AT)
Corresponding author
Krause, Jette
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
443
Pages
141084
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391486754
Cited by
53
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre
  • Horizon 2020 (101006598)
  • European Union
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Keywords
well-to-wheel analysis, road transport decarbonization, fleet electrification, powertrain electrification, e-fuels, advanced biofuels, renewable electricity, energy consumption, vehicle efficiency, transport energy demand, carbon capture and storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review