The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study
McKee, P. A., Castelli, W. P., McNamara, P. M., & Kannel, W. B. (1971) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197112232852601 · Cited by 3,448
History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project
Melton, L. J. (1996) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/71.3.266 · Cited by 1,443
COLDITZ, G. A., MARTIN, P., STAMPFER, M. J., WILLETT, W. C., SAMPSON, L., ROSNER, B., HENNEKENS, C. H., & SPEIZER, F. E. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114319 · Cited by 992 · cited 7×
“In general, self-reports on medical conditions that are well defined and relatively easily diagnosed have good agreement, in contrast to conditions characterized by complex nonspecific symptoms [7].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialComparing self-reported and physician-reported medical history
Kehoe, R., Wu, S.-Y., Leske, M. C., & Chylack, L. T. (1994) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117078 · Cited by 441
Vargas, C. M., Burt, V. L., Gillum, R. F., & Pamuk, E. R. (1997) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1997.0190 · Cited by 269 · cited 4×
“The form of analysis and presentation of findings also varies among studies: Some authors focused on subjects who reported the presence of disease and those who denied disease [1–6,8–12,14,15,18,19], whereas”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Zhou, B., Carrillo-Larco, R. M., Danaei, G., Riley, L. M., Paciorek, C. J., Stevens, G. A., Gregg, E. W., Bennett, J. E., Solomon, B., Singleton, R. K., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01330-1 · Cited by 3,902
Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods
Althubaiti, A. (2016) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s104807 · Cited by 3,018
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017
American Diabetes Association (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci18-0007 · Cited by 2,528
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007
American Diabetes Association (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-9017 · Cited by 1,323
Yusuf, S., Islam, S., Chow, C. K., Rangarajan, S., Dagenais, G., Diaz, R., Gupta, R., Kelishadi, R., Iqbal, R., Avezum, A., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61215-4 · Cited by 964
Metadata
- Authors
- Okura, Y., Urban, L. H., Mahoney, D. W., Jacobsen, S. J., & Rodeheffer, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1096-1103
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975202701
- Cited by
- 1,234
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 82.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.005
- The paper
- Okura, Y., Urban, L. H., Mahoney, D. W., Jacobsen, S. J., & Rodeheffer, R. J. (2004). Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
