Cited by 441Survey Methodology and NonresponseStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyHealth and Medical Studies

Comparing self-reported and physician-reported medical history

Kehoe, Robert, Wu, Suh-Yuh, Leske, M. Cristina, Chylack, Leo T.·1994·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The authors compared self-reported medical history and medication use in a cataract case-control study of 1,380 persons (1985-1989) in Boston, Massachusetts, with information from the participants' physicians. Under- and overreporting varied by condition and type of medication. A self-reported history of hypertension had the highest sensitivity (91%), and diabetes history had the highest specificity (97%). Among different medications investigated, self-reported antihypertensive medication use was the most sensitive (88%), while self-reported use of insulin was the most specific (99%). Differences between patient- and physician-reported frequencies were very small, except for arthritis (15%) and regular aspirin use (21%). Results suggest an accurate recall of medical and drug usage history in well-defined chronic conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117078

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kehoe, R., Wu, S.-Y., Leske, M. C., & Chylack, L. T.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Leske, M. Cristina
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1994-04-15
Volume
139
Issue
8
Pages
813-818
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W1935998299
Cited by
441
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
35.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (EY 05733)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
recall accuracy, underreporting, overreporting, cataract, medication use, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, antihypertensive drugs, insulin, arthritis, aspirin, chronic disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Cataract, Chronic Disease, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Medical History Taking, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Bias, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review