Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables

Open access
Sourial, Nadia, Wolfson, Christina, Zhu, Bin, Quail, Jacqueline, Fletcher, John, Karunananthan, Sathya, Bandeen-Roche, Karen, Béland, François, Bergman, Howard·2010·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective Correspondence Analysis (CA) is a multivariate graphical technique designed to explore relationships among categorical variables. Epidemiologists frequently collect data on multiple categorical variables with to the goal of examining associations amongst these variables. Nevertheless, despite its usefulness in this context, CA appears to be an underused technique in epidemiology. The objective of this paper is to present the utility of CA in an epidemiological context. Study Design and Setting The theory and interpretation of CA in the case of two variables and more than two variables is illustrated through two examples. Results The outcome from correspondence analysis is a graphical display of the rows and columns of a contingency table that is designed to permit visualization of the salient relationships among the variable responses in a low-dimensional space. Such a representation reveals a more global picture of the relationships among row-column pairs which would otherwise not be detected through a pairwise analysis. Conclusion When the study variables of interest are categorical, CA is an appropriate technique to explore relationships amongst variable response categories and can play a complementary role in analyzing epidemiological data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Sourial, N., Wolfson, C., Zhu, B., Quail, J., Fletcher, J., Karunananthan, S., Bandeen-Roche, K., Béland, F., & Bergman, H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
638-646
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059187041
Cited by
441
References
27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008
The paper
Sourial, N., Wolfson, C., Zhu, B., Quail, J., Fletcher, J., Karunananthan, S., Bandeen-Roche, K., Béland, F., & Bergman, H. (2010). Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.