Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions underreport important details of the intervention

Gagnier, Joel J., Moher, David, Boon, Heather, Beyene, Joseph, Bombardier, Claire·2011·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.005

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Millar, 2001, Patterns of use—alternative health care practitioners, Health Rep, 13, 9
  2. Eisenberg, 1998, Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey, JAMA, 280, 1559, 10.1001/jama.280.18.1569 · DOI
  3. Esmail, 2007, Complementary and alternative medicine in Canada, Public Policy Sources, 87, 1
  4. Linde, 2001, The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture, Int J Epidemiol, 30, 526, 10.1093/ije/30.3.526 · DOI
  5. Moher, 2002, Assessing the quality of reports of randomized trials in pediatric and complementary and alternative medicine, BMC Pediatr, 2, 2, 10.1186/1471-2431-2-2 · DOI
  6. Altman, 2001, The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 134, 663, 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gagnier, 2006, Herbal medicine for low back pain, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10.1002/14651858.CD004504.pub3 · DOI
  8. Little, 2000, Herbal therapy for treating rheumatoid arthritis, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  9. Gagnier, 2006, Reporting quality of controlled intervention trials of herbal medicine, Am J Med, 119, 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.02.006 · DOI
  10. Wolsko, 2005, Lack of herbal supplement characterization in published randomized controlled trials, Am J Med, 118, 1087, 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.076 · DOI
  11. Linde, 2001, Systematic reviews of complementary therapies—an annotated bibliography. Part 2: herbal medicine, BMC Complement Altern Med, 1, 5, 10.1186/1472-6882-1-5 · DOI
  12. Gagnier, 2006, Reporting randomized controlled clinical trials of herbal medicines: an elaborated CONSORT statement, Ann Intern Med, 144, 364, 10.7326/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00013 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gagnier, 2006, Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled clinical trials of herbal medicine interventions: explanation and elaboration, J Clin Epidemiol, 59, 1134, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.020 · DOI
  14. Robinson, 2002, Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed, Int J Epidemiol, 31, 150, 10.1093/ije/31.1.150 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Linde, 2001, Systematic reviews of complementary therapies—an annotated bibliography. Part 2: herbal medicine, BMC Complement Altern Med, 1, 5, 10.1186/1472-6882-1-5 · DOI
  16. Moher, 2002, Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine, BMC Pediatr, 2, 3, 10.1186/1471-2431-2-3 · DOI
  17. Harnack, 2001, Prevalence of use of herbal products among adults in the Minneapolis/St Paul, Minn, metropolitan area, Mayo Clin Proc, 76, 688, 10.4065/76.7.688 · DOI
  18. Concato, 1995, Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis. I. Background, goals, and general strategy, J Clin Epidemiol, 48, 1495, 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00510-2 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Peduzzi, 1996, A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis, J Clin Epidemiol, 49, 1373, 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pildal, 2007, Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials, Int J Epidemiol, 36, 847, 10.1093/ije/dym087 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Egger, 2001, Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials, JAMA, 285, 1996, 10.1001/jama.285.15.1996 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Altman, 2002, How statistical expertise is used in medical research, JAMA, 287, 2817, 10.1001/jama.287.21.2817 · DOI
  23. Kane, 2007, Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement, J Clin Epidemiol, 60, 241, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.016 · DOI
  24. Pengel, 2009, The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in solid organ transplantation, Transpl Int, 22, 377, 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2008.00789.x · DOI
  25. Balasubramanian, 2006, Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery: can we do better?, Ann Surg, 244, 663, 10.1097/01.sla.0000217640.11224.05 · DOI
  26. Rochon, 2002, Comparison of review articles published in peer reviewed and throwaway journals, JAMA, 287, 2853, 10.1001/jama.287.21.2853 · DOI
  27. Moher, 2001, Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before and after evaluation, JAMA, 285, 1992, 10.1001/jama.285.15.1992 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Moher, 1996, Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implication for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews, Lancet, 347, 363, 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90538-3 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Junker, 1998, Adherence to published standards of reporting: a comparison of placebo-controlled trials published in English or German, JAMA, 280, 247, 10.1001/jama.280.3.247 · DOI
  30. Devereaux, 2002, The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist, Control Clin Trials, 23, 380, 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00214-3 · DOI
  31. Moher, 2002, Assessing the quality of reports of randomized trials in pediatric and complementary and alternative medicine, BMC Pediatr, 2, 2, 10.1186/1471-2431-2-2 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gagnier, J. J., Moher, D., Boon, H., Beyene, J., & Bombardier, C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
64
Issue
7
Pages
760-769
ISSN
0895-4356
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.005
Cited by
32
References
5
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.