Cited by 608Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement

Gagnier, Joel J., Boon, Heather, Rochon, Paula, Moher, David, Barnes, Joanne, Bombardier, Claire, for the CONSORT Group*·2006·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Herbal medicinal products are widely used, vary greatly in content and quality, and are actively tested in randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). The authors' objective was to develop recommendations for reporting RCTs of herbal medicine interventions, based on the need to elaborate on the 22-item CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) checklist. Telephone calls were made and a consensus meeting was held with 16 participants in Toronto, Canada, to develop these recommendations. The group agreed on context-specific elaborations of 9 CONSORT checklist items for RCTs of herbal medicines. Item 4, concerning the herbal medicine intervention, required the most extensive elaboration. These recommendations have been developed to improve the reporting of RCTs using herbal medicine interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00013

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small number of CONSORT extension statements contain expanded guidance about describing interventions, such as non-pharmacological interventions and specific intervention categories, such as acupuncture and herbal interventions.

    “A small number of CONSORT extension statements contain expanded guidance about describing interventions, such as non-pharmacological interventions 6 and specific intervention categories, such as acupuncture and herbal interventions. 7,8”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gagnier, J. J., Boon, H., Rochon, P., Moher, D., Barnes, J., Bombardier, C., & for the CONSORT Group*
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2006-03-07
Volume
144
Issue
5
Pages
364-367
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2108432873
Cited by
608
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 25
FWCI
41.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
herbal medicine, randomized controlled trials, trial reporting, CONSORT checklist, reporting guidelines, herbal intervention, herbal medicinal products, consensus recommendations
MeSH terms
Publishing, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Herbal Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review