Cited by 1,055Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCoronary Artery Anomalies

Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality

Open access
Min, James K., Shaw, Leslee J., Devereux, Richard B., Okin, Peter M., Weinsaft, Jonathan W., Russo, Donald J., Lippolis, Nicholas J., Berman, Daniel S. +1 more·2007·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the association of all-cause death with the coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA)-defined extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Background The prognostic value of identifying CAD by CCTA remains undefined. Methods We examined a single-center consecutive cohort of 1,127 patients > or =45 years old with chest symptoms. Stenosis by CCTA was scored as minimal ( or =70%) for each coronary artery. Plaque was assessed in 3 ways: 1) moderate or obstructive plaque; 2) CCTA score modified from Duke coronary artery score; and 3) simple clinical scores grading plaque extent and distribution. A 15.3 +/- 3.9-month follow-up of all-cause death was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for pretest CAD likelihood and risk factors. Deaths were verified by the Social Security Death Index. Results The CCTA predictors of death included proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis and number of vessels with > or =50% and > or =70% stenosis (all p or =70% or 2 stenoses > or =50% (p = 0.013) to 85% survival for > or =50% LM artery stenosis (p Conclusions In patients with chest pain, CCTA identifies increased risk for all-cause death. Importantly, a negative CCTA portends an extremely low risk for death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.067

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-calcified/mixed characteristics, a stenosis grade of ≥50%, and the proximal location of coronary plaques are established risk factors for ischaemic heart disease.

    “The non-calcified/mixed characteristics, a stenosis grade of ≥50%, and the proximal location of coronary plaques are all established risk factors for ischaemic heart disease.14,21”
  • Overall coronary plaque burden is associated with higher mortality risk.

    “the overall coronary plaque burden, which is associated with higher mortality risk”
  • Calcified plaques are considered more stable and less prone to rupture compared with mixed or non-calcified plaques, which are associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events.

    “as calcified plaques are considered more stable and less prone to rupture compared with mixed or non-calcified plaques, which are associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events.21 22”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Min, J. K., Shaw, L. J., Devereux, R. B., Okin, P. M., Weinsaft, J. W., Russo, D. J., Lippolis, N. J., Berman, D. S., & Callister, T. Q.
Affiliations
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
1161-1170
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090087329
Cited by
1,055
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 61
FWCI
55.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Coronary Artery Anomalies
Keywords
coronary artery disease, all-cause mortality, coronary artery stenosis, plaque burden, left main coronary artery stenosis, risk stratification, chest pain, prognosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Cause of Death, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cohort Studies, Survival Analysis, Coronary Angiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review