Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Drug targeting and tumor heterogeneity

Open access
Bae, You Han·2009·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

“Missile drug,” “Magic bullet” or similar words found in newspaper articles or public magazines have often fascinated general readers and scientists for the reason that these words in some way implicate ‘remote,’ ‘seeking’ and ‘selective destruction.’ “Drug targeting” was initially used to describe the possible in vivo action of an anticancer drug conjugated to amonoclonal antibody (mAb) which is specific to a surface antigen on target cancer cells. Since then, a range of targeting systems were devised and appeared in scientific papers. These targeting systems exploit over-expressed receptors of nutrients or specific chemistry on cancer cells. The ‘targeting’ has also given an impression that such conjugates find target cells similar to a smart missile, which may actively chase its target from miles away. This is certainly not the case. It is seemingly not possible that any water-soluble or nano-sized construct, designed as a drug carrier and introduced into the blood stream, will actively seek target cells that are remotely sitting in solid tumors. It is likely that the drug carriers stumble on floating cells such as leukemic cells in the blood compartment by a probability of collision. To reach its target solid tumor site, a drug conjugate or drug carrier must find the fenestraes (openings) on the tumor blood vessels by chance through convectional flow and random diffusional process. This process, which is linked to probability issues, is called ‘passive targeting’ coupled with ‘enhanced permeability (EP)’ [1]. The EP effect on carrier accumulation at tumor sites may be compromised by an opposite force; hydrostatic pressure, which is slightly higher in tumor extracellular space than in normal tissues/organs. Traditionally, tumor targeting approaches are classified into ‘passive targeting’ and ‘active targeting’; however, the active targeting process cannot be separated from the passive because it occurs only after passive accumulation in tumors. Long-circulating property has always been valuable. A longer circulation time definitely improves the probability for a carrier to find large openings on the blood vessels. During circulation in the blood stream, the incorporated drug should remain in the carrier to give high enough concentrations at the target sites. If premature release of drug occurs before the carrier reaches therapeutic sites, it may not help in drug accumulation at the tumor sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.09.074

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Bae, Y. H.
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
2-3
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039872518
Cited by
233
References
0
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug targeting and tumor heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.09.074
The paper
Bae, Y. H. (2009). Drug targeting and tumor heterogeneity. Journal of Controlled Release. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.09.074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.