Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 404

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Injectable, long-acting PLGA formulations: Analyzing PLGA and understanding microparticle formation

Park, Kinam, Skidmore, Sarah, Hadar, Justin, Garner, John, Park, Haesun, Otte, Andrew, Soh, Bong Kwan, Yoon, Gwangheum, Yu, Dijia, Yun, Yeonhee, Lee, Byung Kook, Jiang, Xiaohui, Wang, Yan·2019·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

Injectable, long-acting depot formulations based on poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) have been used clinically since 1989. Despite 30 years of development, however, there are only 19 different drugs in PLGA formulations approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The difficulty in developing depot formulations stems in large part from the lack of a clear molecular understanding of PLGA polymers and a mechanistic understanding of PLGA microparticles formation. The difficulty is readily apparent by the absence of approved PLGA-based generic products, limiting access to affordable medicines to all patients. PLGA has been traditionally characterized by its molecular weight, lactide:glycolide (L:G) ratio, and end group. Characterization of non-linear PLGA, such as star-shaped glucose-PLGA, has been difficult due to the shortcomings in analytical methods typically used for PLGA. In addition, separation of a mixture of different PLGAs has not been previously identified, especially when only their L:G ratios are different while the molecular weights are the same. New analytical methods were developed to determine the branch number of star-shaped PLGAs, and to separate PLGAs based on L:G ratios regardless of the molecular weight. A deeper understanding of complex PLGA formulations can be achieved with these new characterization methods. Such methods are important for further development of not only PLGA depot formulations with controllable drug release kinetics, but also generic formulations of current brand-name products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.05.003

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 404

Metadata

Authors
Park, K., Skidmore, S., Hadar, J., Garner, J., Park, H., Otte, A., Soh, B. K., Yoon, G., Yu, D., Yun, Y., Lee, B. K., Jiang, X., & Wang, Y.
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
304
Pages
125-134
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943940643
Cited by
404
References
39
FWCI
15.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Injectable, long-acting PLGA formulations: Analyzing PLGA and understanding microparticle formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.05.003
The paper
Park, K., Skidmore, S., Hadar, J., Garner, J., Park, H., Otte, A., Soh, B. K., Yoon, G., Yu, D., Yun, Y., Lee, B. K., Jiang, X., & Wang, Y. (2019). Injectable, long-acting PLGA formulations: Analyzing PLGA and understanding microparticle formation. Journal of Controlled Release. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.05.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.