The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delivering the power of nanomedicine to patients today
Open accessAbstract
The situation of the COVID-19 pandemic reminds us that we permanently need high-value flexible solutions to urgent clinical needs including simplified diagnostic technologies suitable for use in the field and for delivering targeted therapeutics. From our perspective nanotechnology is revealed as a vital resource for this, as a generic platform of technical solutions to tackle complex medical challenges. It is towards this perspective and focusing on nanomedicine that we take issue with Prof Park's recent editorial published in the Journal of Controlled Release. Prof. Park argued that in the last 15 years nanomedicine failed to deliver the promised innovative clinical solutions to the patients (Park, K. The beginning of the end of the nanomedicine hype. Journal of Controlled Release, 2019; 305, 221-222 [1]. We, the ETPN (European Technology Platform on Nanomedicine) [2], respectfully disagree. In fact, the more than 50 formulations currently in the market, and the recent approval of 3 key nanomedicine products (e. g. Onpattro, Hensify and Vyxeos), have demonstrated that the nanomedicine field is concretely able to design products that overcome critical barriers in conventional medicine in a unique manner, but also to deliver within the cells new drug-free therapeutic effects by using pure physical modes of action, and therefore make a difference in patients lives. Furthermore, the >400 nanomedicine formulations currently in clinical trials are expecting to bring novel clinical solutions (e.g. platforms for nucleic acid delivery), alone or in combination with other key enabling technologies to the market, including biotechnologies, microfluidics, advanced materials, biomaterials, smart systems, photonics, robotics, textiles, Big Data and ICT (information & communication technologies) more generally. However, we agree with Prof. Park that " it is time to examine the sources of difficulty in clinical translation of nanomedicine and move forward ". But for reaching this goal, the investments to support clinical translation of promising nanomedicine formulations should increase, not decrease. As recently encouraged by EMA in its roadmap to 2025, we should create more unity through a common knowledge hub linking academia, industry, healthcare providers and hopefully policy makers to reduce the current fragmentation of the standardization and regulatory body landscape. We should also promote a strategy of cross-technology innovation, support nanomedicine development as a high value and low-cost solution to answer unmet medical needs and help the most promising innovative projects of the field to get better and faster to the clinic. This global vision is the one that the ETPN chose to encourage for the last fifteen years. All actions should be taken with a clear clinical view in mind, " without any fanfare", to focus "on what matters in real life", which is the patient and his/her quality of life. This ETPN overview of achievements in nanomedicine serves to reinforce our drive towards further expanding and growing the maturity of nanomedicine for global healthcare, accelerating the pace of transformation of its great potential into tangible medical breakthroughs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours
Wilhelm, S., Tavares, A. J., Dai, Q., Ohta, S., Audet, J., Dvorak, H. F., & Chan, W. C. W. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14 · Cited by 5,218
Patisiran, an RNAi Therapeutic, for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis
Adams, D., Gonzalez-Duarte, A., O’Riordan, W. D., Yang, C.-C., Ueda, M., Kristen, A. V., Tournev, I., Schmidt, H. H., Coelho, T., Berk, J. L., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1716153 · Cited by 3,047
Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters
Wong, C. H., Siah, K. W., & Lo, A. W. (2019) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069 · Cited by 1,585
Alzheimer’s disease: pathogenesis, diagnostics, and therapeutics
Tiwari, S., Atluri, V., Kaushik, A., Yndart, A., & Nair, M. (2019) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s200490 · Cited by 1,308
Evaluation of nanomedicines: stick to the basics
McNeil, S. E. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.73 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Medical 4.0 technologies for healthcare: Features, capabilities, and applications
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Pratap Singh, R., & Suman, R. (2022) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2022.04.001 · Cited by 468
A translational framework to DELIVER nanomedicines to the clinic
Joyce, P., Allen, C. J., Alonso, M. J., Ashford, M., Bradbury, M. S., Germain, M., Kavallaris, M., Langer, R., Lammers, T., Peracchia, M. T., et al. (2024) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-024-01754-7 · Cited by 333
Self-citationZi, Y., Yang, K., He, J., Wu, Z., Liu, J., & Zhang, W. (2022) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114449 · Cited by 268
Maeda, H. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11030229 · Cited by 167
The in vivo fate of polymeric micelles
Cai, Y., Qi, J., Lu, Y., He, H., & Wu, W. (2022) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114463 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Germain, M., Caputo, F., Metcalfe, S., Tosi, G., Spring, K., Åslund, A. K. O., Pottier, A., Schiffelers, R., Ceccaldi, A., & Schmid, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Controlled Release
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 326
- Pages
- 164-171
- ISSN
- 0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3042581126
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delivering the power of nanomedicine to patients today. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.007
- The paper
- Germain, M., Caputo, F., Metcalfe, S., Tosi, G., Spring, K., Åslund, A. K. O., Pottier, A., Schiffelers, R., Ceccaldi, A., & Schmid, R. (2020). Delivering the power of nanomedicine to patients today. Journal of Controlled Release. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.