The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying and reducing model-form uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations: A data-driven, physics-informed Bayesian approach
Open accessAbstract
Despite their well-known limitations, Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models are still the workhorse tools for turbulent flow simulations in today's engineering application. For many practical flows, the turbulence models are by far the largest source of uncertainty. In this work we develop an open-box, physics-informed Bayesian framework for quantifying model-form uncertainties in RANS simulations. Uncertainties are introduced directly to the Reynolds stresses and are represented with compact parameterization accounting for empirical prior knowledge and physical constraints (e.g., realizability, smoothness, and symmetry). An iterative ensemble Kalman method is used to assimilate the prior knowledge and observation data in a Bayesian framework, and to propagate them to posterior distributions of velocities and other Quantities of Interest (QoIs). We use two representative cases, the flow over periodic hills and the flow in a square duct, to evaluate the performance of the proposed framework. Simulation results suggest that, even with very sparse observations, the posterior mean velocities and other QoIs have significantly better agreement with the benchmark data compared to the baseline results. At most locations the posterior distribution adequately captures the true model error within the developed model form uncertainty bounds. The framework is a major improvement over existing black-box, physics-neutral methods for model-form uncertainty quantification, and has potential implications in many fields in which the model uncertainty comes from unresolved physical processes. A notable example is climate modeling, where high-consequence decisions are made based on predictions (e.g., projected temperature rise) with major uncertainties originating from closure models that are used to account for unresolved or unknown physics including radiation, cloud, and boundary layer processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tennekes, H., & Lumley, J. L. (1972) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3014.001.0001 · Cited by 8,340
Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets
Daubechies, I. (1988) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.3160410705 · Cited by 8,190
Wilcox, D. C. (1993) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 7,475
A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows
Patankar, S. V., & SPALDING, D. B. (1972) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/0017-9310(72)90054-3 · Cited by 6,006
Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation
Rhie, C. M., & Chow, W. L. (1983) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.8284 · Cited by 4,470
Bayesian calibration of computer models
Kennedy, M. C., & O'Hagan, A. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00294 · Cited by 4,222
Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure
Launder, B. E., Reece, G. J., & Rodi, W. (1975) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112075001814 · Cited by 4,003
Launder, B. E., & Sharma, B. I. (1974) · Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/0094-4548(74)90150-7 · Cited by 2,774
Thomas, D. G. (1972) · Nuclear Science and Engineering · doi:10.13182/nse72-a35514 · Cited by 2,033
Radial basis functions theory and implementations
Buhmann, M. (2003) · Cited by 1,861
Cited by
Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics
Brunton, S. L., Noack, B. R., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2020) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 · Cited by 3,063
Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data
Duraisamy, K., Iaccarino, G., & Xiao, H. (2019) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547 · Cited by 1,508
Self-citationWang, J.-X., Wu, J.-L., & Xiao, H. (2017) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.2.034603 · Cited by 737
Self-citationQuantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: A review
Xiao, H., & Cinnella, P. (2019) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.10.001 · Cited by 434
Self-citationSubgrid modelling for two-dimensional turbulence using neural networks
Maulik, R., San, O., Rasheed, A., & Vedula, P. (2019) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.770 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, H., Wu, J.-L., Wang, J.-X., Sun, R., & Roy, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 324
- Pages
- 115-136
- ISSN
- 0021-9991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2490045648
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying and reducing model-form uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations: A data-driven, physics-informed Bayesian approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.07.038
- The paper
- Xiao, H., Wu, J.-L., Wang, J.-X., Sun, R., & Roy, C. J. (2016). Quantifying and reducing model-form uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations: A data-driven, physics-informed Bayesian approach. Journal of Computational Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.07.038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.