The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feminine to smell but masculine to touch? Multisensory congruence and its effect on the aesthetic experience
Open accessAbstract
We draw upon literature examining cross‐modal sensory interactions and congruence to explore the impact of smell on touch. In line with our predictions, two experiments show that smell can impact touch in meaningful ways. Specifically, we show that multisensory semantic congruence between smell and touch properties of a stimulus enhances haptic perception and product evaluation. We explore this relationship in the context of two properties of touch, namely texture and temperature, and demonstrate that both smell and touch can have semantic associations, which can affect haptic perception and product evaluation depending on whether they match or not. In study 1, we focus on the semantic association of smell and touch (texture) with gender and in study 2 with temperature. Our results extend prior work on smell and touch within consumer behavior, and further contribute to emerging literature on multisensory interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1162548 · Cited by 1,429
The Effects of Advertising Copy on Sensory Thoughts and Perceived Taste
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/605327 · Cited by 350 · cited 1×
“…sound and vision (Russell, 2002), sound and smell (Spangenberg, Grohmann, & Sprott, 2005), sound and perceived taste (Yorkston & Menon, 2004), touch and taste (Krishna & Morrin, 2008), vision and taste (Hoegg & Alba, 2007), as well as multisensory cognitions and taste (Elder & Krishna, 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Ki, C. ‘., & Kim, Y. (2019) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21244 · Cited by 749
The Multilevel Nature of Customer Experience Research: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda
Kranzbühler, A., Kleijnen, M. H. P., Morgan, R. E., & Teerling, M. (2018) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12140 · Cited by 389
Roggeveen, A. L., Grewal, D., & Schweiger, E. B. (2020) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2019.11.002 · Cited by 308
That Sounds Sweet: Using Cross‐Modal Correspondences to Communicate Gustatory Attributes
Knoeferle, K. M., Woods, A., Käppler, F., & Spence, C. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20766 · Cited by 137
Wörfel, P., Frentz, F., & Tautu, C. (2022) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-07-2020-0510 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishna, A., Elder, R. S., & Caldara, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 410-418
- ISSN
- 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7663
- OpenAlex
- W2002640452
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminine to smell but masculine to touch? Multisensory congruence and its effect on the aesthetic experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.010
- The paper
- Krishna, A., Elder, R. S., & Caldara, C. (2010). Feminine to smell but masculine to touch? Multisensory congruence and its effect on the aesthetic experience. Journal of Consumer Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.