The DOI matches its Crossref record; 151 of the 151 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Multilevel Nature of Customer Experience Research: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda
Open accessAbstract
Over the last three decades, customer experience (CE) has developed from a burgeoning concept to a widely recognized phenomenon in terms of both research and practice. To account for the complexity of consumption decisions, the CE literature encompasses both the rational information processing approach to consumer decision‐making and the experiential approach, which includes emotions, feelings and sub‐consciousness. The authors classify and examine CE research on two levels. Studies on static CE analyze experiences during touchpoints at one point in time, while studies on dynamic CE assess how experiences evolve over time. Furthermore, both static and dynamic CE research take place from two distinct theoretical perspectives: the organization and the consumer. As both theoretical perspectives essentially deal with the same phenomenon – the organizational perspective with the creation of CEs and the consumer perspective with the perception of customer experiences – there is potential for a productive symbiosis between them. The authors propose that connecting insights from both perspectives can contribute to a better understanding of what constitutes a CE for consumers and how firms can effectively manage it. First, the authors discuss the development of CE and argue that it has evolved into a broad and fragmented ‘umbrella construct’. Second, after distinguishing and defining static and dynamic CE, they systematically evaluate the state of knowledge in both the organizational and consumer perspectives. Finally, they develop an agenda for future research that integrates the consumer perspective into organizational CE research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & the PRISMA-P Group (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647 · Cited by 13,120
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208906 · Cited by 8,275
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
(1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,295
Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees
Bitner, M. J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252042 · Cited by 7,271
Johnsen, E. (1964) · Ledelse & erhvervsøkonomi · Cited by 4,989
Cited by
Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research
Becker, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00718-x · Cited by 944
Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms
Bolton, R. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Cheung, L., Gallan, A., Orsingher, C., Witell, L., & Zaki, M. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2018-0113 · Cited by 849
Going on a journey: A review of the customer journey literature
Tueanrat, Y., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.028 · Cited by 282
Slow tourism: Conceptualization and interpretation – A travel vloggers’ perspective
Manthiou, A., Klaus, P., & Luong, V. H. (2022) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104570 · Cited by 86
Viewpoint: phygital – the emperor’s new clothes?
Klaus, P. ‘. (2024) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2021.1976252 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Kranzbühler, A., Kleijnen, M. H. P., Morgan, R. E., & Teerling, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-21
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 433-456
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W2603372140
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 151
- FWCI
- 48.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Multilevel Nature of Customer Experience Research: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ijmr.12140
- The paper
- Kranzbühler, A., Kleijnen, M. H. P., Morgan, R. E., & Teerling, M. (2018). The Multilevel Nature of Customer Experience Research: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.