The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do-not-resuscitate order: a view throughout the world
Abstract
Resuscitation has the ability to reverse premature death. It can also prolong terminal illness, increase discomfort, and consume resources. The do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order and advance directives are still a debated issue in critical care. This review will focus on several aspects, regarding withholding and/or withdrawing therapies and advance directives in different continents. It is widely known that there is a great diversity of cultural and religious beliefs in society, and therefore, some critical ethical and legal issues have still to be solved. To achieve a consensus, we believe in the priority of continuing education and training programs for health care professionals. It is our opinion that a serious reflection on ethical values and principles would be useful to understand the definition of medical professionalism to make it possible to undertake the best way to avoid futile and aggressive care. There is evidence of the lack of DNR order policy worldwide. Therefore, it appears clear that there is a need for standardization. To improve the attitude about the DNR order, it is necessary to achieve several goals such as: increased communication, consensus on law, increased trust among patients and health care systems, and improved standards and quality of care to respect the patient's will and the family's role.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Four systematic reviews reported mixed findings regarding the impact of advance directives on the documentation of patient's wishes about treatment escalation and resuscitation decision-making. 5,9,10,14”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Evidence from 13 RCTs and from 8 nonrandomised studies included in 3 systematic reviews suggests associations of communication interventions with an increased frequency of DNACPR orders. 4,7,8,10”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Accordingly, the certainty of existing evidence has been judged most frequently as low to very low by authors of systematic reviews. 7 10,28,38,39,43,44,72”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Ito, 2009, On a principal of advance directives, Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 36, 66
- Payne, 2008, Clinical perspectives on portable do-not-resuscitate orders, J Gerontol Nurs, 34, 11, 10.3928/00989134-20081001-06 · DOI
- Vincent, 2005, Outcome and ethics in severe brain damage, Prog Brain Res, 150, 555, 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50039-6 · DOI
- Wenger, 1995, Epidemiology of do-not-resuscitate orders. disparity by age, diagnosis, gender, race, and functional impairment, Arch Intern Med, 155, 2056, 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430190042006 · DOI
- García, 2000, Sociodemographic factors and the assignment of do-not-resuscitate orders in patients with acute myocardial infarctions, Med Care, 38, 670, 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00008 · DOI
- 1997, Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine's Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments, Crit Care Med, 25, 887, 10.1097/00003246-199705000-00028 · DOI
- Lippert, 2010, European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 10. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions, Resuscitation, 81, 1445, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.013 · DOI
- Curtis, 2007, Point: the ethics of unilateral “do not resuscitate” orders: the role of “informed assent”, Chest, 132, 748, 10.1378/chest.07-0745 · DOI
- Pochard, 2001, Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity, Crit Care Med, 29, 1893, 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00007 · DOI
- Azoulay, 2005, Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 171, 987, 10.1164/rccm.200409-1295OC · DOI · Paper page
- Hall, 2000, End-of-life care in the ICU: treatments provided when life support was or was not withdrawn, Chest, 118, 1424, 10.1378/chest.118.5.1424 · DOI
- Kierzek, 2010, Advance directives and surrogate decision making before death, N Engl J Med, 363, 295, 10.1056/NEJMc1005312 · DOI
- Mirarchi, 2009, TRIAD II: do living wills have an impact on pre-hospital lifesaving care?, J Emerg Med, 36, 105, 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.10.003 · DOI
- Curtis, 2010, Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit, Lancet, 376, 1347, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60143-2 · DOI
- Guo, 2010, Advance directives and do-not-resuscitate orders in patients with cancer with metastatic spinal cord compression: advanced care planning implications, J Palliat Med, 13, 513, 10.1089/jpm.2009.0376 · DOI
- Venneman, 2008, “Allow natural death” versus “do not resuscitate”: three words that can change a life, J Med Ethics, 34, 2, 10.1136/jme.2006.018317 · DOI
- National Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), Emergency Cardiac Care (ECC), 1986, Standards and guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC). Part VIII: medicolegal considerations and recommendations, JAMA, 255, 2979, 10.1001/jama.255.21.2979 · DOI
- Truog, 1991, ‘Do-not-resuscitate’ orders during anesthesia and surgery, Anesthesiology, 74, 606, 10.1097/00000542-199103000-00030 · DOI
- Holley, 2009, Documentation of code status and discussion of goals of care in gravely ill hospitalized patients, J Crit Care, 24, 288, 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.03.035 · DOI
- Cohen, 2009, The impact of do-not-resuscitate order on triage decisions to a medical intensive care unit, J Crit Care, 24, 311, 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.01.007 · DOI
- Oliveira, 2009, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): three letters that change the people's life. forever, Arq Neuro-psiquiatr, 67, 750, 10.1590/S0004-282X2009000400040 · DOI
- Vincent, 2004, Withholding and withdrawing life prolonging treatment in the intensive care unit: a current European perspective, Chron Respir Dis, 1, 115, 10.1191/1479972304cd021rs · DOI
- Seymour, 2010, Implementing advance care planning: a qualitative study of community nurses' views and experiences, BMC Palliat Care, 8, 4, 10.1186/1472-684X-9-4 · DOI
- 2007, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and do not resuscitate orders, Rev Med Chil, 135, 669
- Van den Block, 2009, Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium, BMJ, 339, b2772, 10.1136/bmj.b2772 · DOI
- Mjåset, 2008, Before and after implementation of do-not-resuscitate orders in a stroke unit, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 128, 2819
- van Wijmen, 2010, Advance directives in the Netherlands: an empirical contribution to the exploration of a cross-cultural perspective on advance directives, Bioethics, 24, 118, 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01788.x · DOI
- 2006, End-of-life care and the intensivist: SIAARTI recommendations on the management of the dying patient, Minerva Anestesiol, 72, 927
- Edin, 2007, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the frail elderly: clinical, ethical and Halakhic issues, IMAJ, 9, 177
- Albar, 2007, Seeking remedy, abstaining from therapy and resuscitation: an Islamic perspective, Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 18, 629
- Jaing, 2007, “Do-not-resuscitate” orders in patients with cancer at a children's hospital in Taiwan, J Med Ethics, 33, 194, 10.1136/jme.2006.016360 · DOI
- Masuda, 2001, Outcomes of written living wills in Japan–a survey of the deceased ones' families, Bioethics Forum, 17, 41
- Olver, 2008, The perceptions of do-not-resuscitate policies of dying patients with cancer, Psychooncology, 17, 347, 10.1002/pon.1246 · DOI
- Shetty, 2010, The parlous state of palliative care in the developing world, Lancet, 376, 1453, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61978-2 · DOI
- Nicholas, 2011, Regional variation in the association between advance directives and end-of-life Medicare expenditures, JAMA, 306, 1447, 10.1001/jama.2011.1410 · DOI
- Morrison, 2010, Part 3: ethics: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care, Circulation, 122, S665, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970905 · DOI
- Gullo, 2010, Professionalism as a pendulum to pay for performance in the changing world, Ann Intern Med, 152, 609
Cited by
Sorted by citations
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions
Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Couper, K., Voorde, P. V. D., Druwé, P., Blom, M., Perkins, G. D., Lulic, I., Djakow, J., Raffay, V., Lilja, G., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017 · Cited by 246
Huang, C.-T., Chuang, Y.-C., Tsai, Y.-J., Ko, W.-J., & Yu, C.-J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159501 · Cited by 27
Clinicians’ Attitudes Towards Do-Not-Resuscitate Directives in a Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia
Madadin, M., Alsaffar, G. M., AlEssa, S. M., Khan, A., Badghaish, D. A., Algarni, S. M., & Menezes, R. G. (2019) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.6510 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Santonocito, C., Ristagno, G., Gullo, A., & Weil, M. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Catania (IT)
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Santonocito, Cristina
- Venue
- Journal of Critical Care
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-21
- ISSN
- 0883-9441 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038339537
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- do-not-resuscitate orders, advance directives, withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, end-of-life care, critical care ethics, medical law, cultural and religious beliefs, medical professionalism, health professions education, patient-family communication
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Education, Continuing, Health Policy, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Reference Standards, Advance Directives, Resuscitation Orders, Cultural Diversity, Healthcare Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review