Cited by 13Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinicians’ Attitudes Towards Do-Not-Resuscitate Directives in a Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia

Open access

Abstract

The Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) directive has provided a major leap in end-of-life care. To demonstrate the factors influencing physicians' DNR decisions in King Fahd University Hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, 42 physicians from the medical and surgical departments of the same center were requested to participate in a cross-sectional survey. Thirty-six questionnaires were completed and returned from a total of 42 distributed among physicians, making a response rate of 85.7%. Certain diagnostic categories increase the likelihood of issuing a DNR order for a patient. Neurological (58.3%) and cardiovascular (41.7%) diseases were the highest response among other diseases in influencing physicians' decisions. In addition, other factors like lack of comorbidities (55.5%), age (52.7%), and previous intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and resuscitation (44.4%) showed an effect on the directive decisions of DNR among investigated physicians. However, weak palliative care in the hospital (11.1%), religious beliefs (5.5%), and gender (2.7%) were the least associated factors affecting physicians' DNR decisions. This study addresses the influencing factors of DNR orders issuance among King Fahd Hospital of the University physicians. Physicians noted that cultural standards and religious beliefs do play a role in their decision-making but had less of an effect as compared to other clinical data such as comorbidities, age, and previous ICU admissions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.6510

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Religion was a clear factor in the decision in countries with strong religious majorities.

    “Similarly, religion was a clear factor in the decision in countries with strong religious majorities.17 55 56”

    From Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Conclusions say religious beliefs played a role in physicians’ DNR decisions at one Saudi hospital. However, the Abstract identifies religion as one of the least associated factors (5.5%), and this single-center study does not establish the claim across countries with strong religious majorities. The copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A clear distinction was evident between countries in which there is a culture of patient autonomy and those where the personal rights of the individual are viewed as less important.

    “A clear distinction was evident between countries in which there is a culture of patient autonomy and those where the personal rights of the individual are viewed as less important.”

    From Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says cultural beliefs and countries of practice affect healthcare workers’ DNR decisions. It does not describe a clear division between countries based on patient autonomy or the importance assigned to individual rights; the study itself surveyed physicians at one Saudi hospital. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Culture and religion are factors that can influence DNACPR decision making.

    “culture and religion are factors that can influence decision making,17 55 56”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Madadin, M., Alsaffar, G. M., AlEssa, S. M., Khan, A., Badghaish, D. A., Algarni, S. M., & Menezes, R. G.
Affiliations
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Corresponding author
Alsaffar, Gada M
Venue
Cureus
Published
2019-12-30
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
e6510-e6510
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998038986
Cited by
13
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
do-not-resuscitate orders, physician attitudes, end-of-life care, clinical decision-making, comorbidities, intensive care unit admission, neurological disorders, cardiovascular disease, palliative care, religious beliefs, cultural standards, Saudi Arabia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review