Cited by 88Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

The effect of vasoactive drugs on mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Open access
Belletti, Alessandro, Benedetto, Umberto, Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe, Leggieri, Carlo, Silvani, Paolo, Angelini, Gianni D., Zangrillo, Alberto, Landoni, Giovanni·2017·Journal of Critical Care

Abstract

Purpose Inotropes and vasopressors are cornerstone of therapy in septic shock, but search for the best agent is ongoing. We aimed to determine which vasoactive drug is associated with the best survival.Materials and methods PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register were searched. Randomized trials performed in septic patients with at least 1 group allocated to an inotrope/vasopressor were included. Network meta-analysis with a frequentist approach was performed.Results The 33 included studies randomized 3470 patients to 16 different comparators. As compared with placebo, levosimendan (odds ratio [OR], 0.17, 95%; confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.60), dobutamine (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.99), epinephrine (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.96), vasopressin (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.89), and norepinephrine plus dobutamine (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.11-0.96) were significantly associated with survival. Norepinephrine improved survival compared with dopamine (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-1.00). Rank analysis showed that levosimendan had the highest probability of being the best treatment.Conclusions Among several regimens for pharmacological cardiovascular support in septic patients, regimens based on inodilators have the highest probability of improve survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.010

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are data from RCTs on short versus long courses in specific conditions such as pneumonia, urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and intraabdominal infections.

    “There are data from RCTs in specific conditions such as pneumonia (286-289), urinary tract infections (290), bacteremia (291, 292), and intraabdominal infections (293).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [287]

    The Study Selection section describes RCTs comparing vasopressors or inotropes in patients with sepsis. Searches for short versus long treatment courses and antibiotic duration in pneumonia, urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and intraabdominal infections found no passage addressing those comparisons. The paper’s discussion of RCTs therefore does not verify the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A network meta-analysis found no significant difference between epinephrine and vasopressin in mortality.

    “In an indirect comparison, a network meta-analysis did not find any significant difference between epinephrine and vasopressin in terms of mortality (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.47–1.88) [362].”
  • A network meta-analysis found dobutamine with norepinephrine had no clear impact on mortality compared with no inotropic agents.

    “Indirect comparison from network meta-analysis showed that dobutamine with norepinephrine had no clear impact on mortality when compared to no inotropic agents (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.32–1.47) [362].”
  • A network meta-analysis found no clear effect on mortality for dobutamine compared with epinephrine.

    “In an indirect comparison of dobutamine versus epinephrine, a network meta-analysis showed no clear effect on mortality (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.47–3.97) [362].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belletti, A., Benedetto, U., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Leggieri, C., Silvani, P., Angelini, G. D., Zangrillo, A., & Landoni, G.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
Corresponding author
Landoni, Giovanni
Venue
Journal of Critical Care
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
37
Pages
91-98
ISSN
0883-9441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2518614997
Cited by
88
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation
  • National Institute of Health Research Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
septic shock, severe sepsis, vasoactive drugs, inotropic agents, vasopressors, levosimendan, dobutamine, epinephrine, vasopressin, norepinephrine, dopamine, inodilators, survival, mortality
MeSH terms
Simendan, Arginine Vasopressin, Cardiotonic Agents, Dobutamine, Dopamine, Epinephrine, Humans, Hydrazones, Norepinephrine, Pyridazines, Shock, Septic, Vasoconstrictor Agents, Vasopressins, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Sepsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review