Criminal stigma, race, and ethnicity: The consequences of imprisonment for employment
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Felony convictions have strong negative effects on callback.
“They find strong negative effects on callback of felony convictions (Decker et al. 2015, Galgano 2009, Mobasseri 2019, Pager 2003, Pager et al. 2009).”
From Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments (2021) · cites this paper as Decker et al. 2015
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971 · see citing works
Pager, D. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374403 · Cited by 2,840 · see citing works
Discrimination in a Low-Wage Labor Market: A Field Experiment
Pager, D., Bonikowski, B., & Western, B. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400505 · Cited by 1,022 · see citing works
Partitioning Variation in Multilevel Models
Goldstein, H., Browne, W., & Rasbash, J. (2002) · Understanding Statistics · doi:10.1207/s15328031us0104_02 · Cited by 874 · see citing works
Discrimination against latino job applicants: A controlled experiment
Bendick, M., Jackson, C. W., Reinoso, V. A., & Hodges, L. E. (1991) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.3930300404 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments
Quillian, L., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090420-035144 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“It’s hard out here if You’re a Black Felon”: A critical examination of black male reentry
Williams, J. M., Wilson, S. K., & Bergeson, C. (2019) · The Prison Journal · doi:10.1177/0032885519852088 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
The challenges of prisoner reentry faced by Native American returning offenders
Wodahl, E. J., & Freng, A. (2017) · Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/15377938.2016.1264336 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Hamovitch, L., Zannella, L., Rempel, E., Graf, H., & Clow, K. (2022) · The Wrongful Conviction Law Review · doi:10.29173/wclawr71 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Decker, S. H., Ortiz, N., Spohn, C., & Hedberg, E.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- National Association of Counties (US)
- Corresponding author
- Decker, Scott H.
- Ortiz, Natalie
- Venue
- Journal of Criminal Justice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 108-121
- ISSN
- 0047-2352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997926271
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 42.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Justice (2010-MU-MU-0004)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Keywords
- criminal stigma, race and ethnicity, employment discrimination, job applications, online job applications, audit tests, education and employment, Black workers, Hispanic workers, Phoenix, Arizona
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
