The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross-links in corneastreated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine to which depth of the cornea the stiffening effect is biomechanically detectable. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany. METHODS: Of 40 enucleated porcine eyes, 20 eyes were treated with the photosensitizer riboflavin (0.1%) and ultraviolet A (UVA) light (370 nm, 3 mW/cm2, 30 minutes); the other 20 eyes served as control. From each eye, 2 flaps of 200 microm thickness were cut with a microkeratome, and strips of 5 mm width and 7 mm length were prepared. Stress-strain behavior was measured with a material tester to characterize the stiffening effect. Five pairs of human donor eyes were tested in the same way. RESULTS: In porcine corneas, the stiffening effect was stronger in the anterior-treated flaps than in the posterior-treated flaps and the control flaps (P = .001). A 5% strain was achieved at a stress of 261.7 +/- 133.2 x 10(3) N/m2 in the anterior-treated flaps and 104.1 +/- 52.7 x 10(3) N/m2 in the anterior control flaps. The posterior-treated flaps (105.0 +/- 55.8 x 10(3) N/m2) and the posterior control flaps (103.7 +/- 61.8 x 10(3) N/m2) showed no difference (P = .95). A similar stiffening effect was observed in human eyes, but contrary to findings in porcine corneas, in human corneas the anterior control flaps were stiffer than the posterior control flaps (P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of the cornea with riboflavin and UVA significantly stiffened the cornea only in the anterior 200 microm. This depth-dependent stiffening effect may be explained by the absorption behavior for UVA in the riboflavin-treated cornea. Sixty-five percent to 70% of UVA irradiation was absorbed within the anterior 200 microm and only 20% in the next 200 microm. Therefore, deeper structures and even the endothelium are not affected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Corneal Collagen Crosslinking: A Systematic Review
Sorkin, N., & Varssano, D. (2014) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000357979 · Cited by 1,918
McCall, A. S., Kraft, S., Edelhauser, H. F., Kidder, G. W., Lundquist, R. R., Bradshaw, H. E., Dedeic, Z., Dionne, M. J. C., Clement, E. M., & Conrad, G. W. (2010) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.09-3738 · Cited by 306
Transverse depth-dependent changes in corneal collagen lamellar orientation and distribution
Abass, A., Hayes, S., White, N., Sorensen, T., & Meek, K. M. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0717 · Cited by 78
Interaction of ultraviolet light with the cornea: clinical implications for corneal crosslinking
Lombardo, M., Pucci, G., Barberi, R., & Lombardo, G. (2015) · Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.013 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Kohlhaas, M., Spoerl, E., Schilde, T., Unger, G., Wittig, C., & Pillunat, L. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-283
- ISSN
- 0146-2776 (ISSN-L)
- 0886-3350
- OpenAlex
- W2131247133
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross-links in corneastreated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.092
- The paper
- Kohlhaas, M., Spoerl, E., Schilde, T., Unger, G., Wittig, C., & Pillunat, L. E. (2006). Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross-links in corneastreated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.