Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human coronavirus circulation in the United States 2014–2017

Open access
Killerby, Marie E., Biggs, Holly M., Haynes, Amber, Dahl, Rebecca M., Mustaquim, Desiree, Gerber, Susan I., Watson, John T.·2018·Journal of Clinical Virology

Abstract

Highlights • During July 2014–June 2017, 854,575 human coronavirus tests were reported to NREVSS.• The percent of positive human coronavirus tests peaked during December–March.• Different human coronavirus species predominated in different years.• Human coronavirus OC43 was the most commonly detected species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.01.019

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Killerby, M. E., Biggs, H. M., Haynes, A., Dahl, R. M., Mustaquim, D., Gerber, S. I., & Watson, J. T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Virology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
101
Pages
52-56
ISSN
1386-6532 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792545913
Cited by
298
References
13
FWCI
29.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human coronavirus circulation in the United States 2014–2017. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcv.2018.01.019
The paper
Killerby, M. E., Biggs, H. M., Haynes, A., Dahl, R. M., Mustaquim, D., Gerber, S. I., & Watson, J. T. (2018). Human coronavirus circulation in the United States 2014–2017. Journal of Clinical Virology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2018.01.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.