Cited by 73Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyOutsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementCAR-T cell therapy research

Decentralized manufacturing of cell and gene therapies: overcoming challenges and identifying opportunities

Open access
Harrison, Richard P., Ruck, Steven, Medcalf, Nicholas, Rafiq, Qasim A.·2017·Cytotherapy

Abstract

Decentralized or "redistributed" manufacturing has the potential to revolutionize the manufacturing approach for cell and gene therapies (CGTs), moving away from the "Fordist" paradigm, delivering health care locally, customized to the end user and, by its very nature, overcoming many of the challenges associated with manufacturing and distribution of high volume goods. In departing from the traditional centralized model of manufacturing, decentralized manufacturing divides production across sites or geographic regions. This paradigm shift imposes significant structural and organisational changes on a business presenting both hidden challenges that must be addressed and opportunities to be embraced. By profoundly adapting business practices, significant advantages can be realized through a democratized value chain, creation of professional-level jobs without geographic restriction to the central hub and a flexibility in response to external pressures and demands. To realize these potential opportunities, however, advances in manufacturing technology and support systems are required, as well as significant changes in the way CGTs are regulated to facilitate multi-site manufacturing. Decentralized manufacturing is likely to be the manufacturing platform of choice for advanced health care therapies-in particular, those with a high degree of personalization. The future success of these promising products will be enhanced by adopting sound business strategies early in development. To realize the benefits that decentralized manufacturing of CGTs has to offer, it is important to examine both the risks and the substantial opportunities present. In this research, we examine both the challenges and the opportunities this shift in business strategy represents in an effort to maximize the success of adoption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.07.005

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Establishing harmonized SOPs across sites, adopting digital batch records with centralized data monitoring, and enabling remote QA oversight could mitigate risks while ensuring consistent quality standards across multiple clinical settings.

    “Establishing harmonized SOPs across sites, adopting digital batch records with centralized data monitoring, and enabling remote QA oversight, such as cloud-based audits or centralized review of production and release data, could mitigate these risks while ensuring consistent quality standards across multiple clinical settings (Harrison et al., 2018; Harrison et al., 2017).”

    From Isolator-based point-of-care manufacturing: a practical solution for GMP-compliant cell and extracellular vesicles therapy production (2025) · cites this paper as Harrison et al., 2017

    In “Systems and technical security” (page unavailable), the paper calls for comparable quality-management systems and consistent standards across sites, and discusses integrated systems that communicate across sites to support oversight. In “Perspectives” (page unavailable), it describes collecting and logging network data. Our copy does not specify harmonized SOPs, digital batch records, remote QA, cloud-based audits, or centralized review of production and release data. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • POC manufacturing is especially suited to autologous therapies by enabling onsite production, reducing transportation time, simplifying logistics, and shortening the vein-to-vein interval.

    “Consequently, POC manufacturing is especially suited to these modalities by enabling onsite production within or near the clinical setting. This arrangement significantly reduces transportation time, simplifies logistics, and shortens the overall vein-to-vein interval (Harrison et al., 2017), which is critical for preserving cell viability and therapeutic potency.”
  • Applying CRISPR/Cas with non-viral delivery of template DNA to eliminate large genes or for orthotopic placement of transgenic constructs could reduce the potential of off-target effects.

    “Applying CRISPR/Cas with non-viral delivery of template DNA to eliminate large genes (145) or for orthotopic placement of transgenic constructs (146) could also reduce the potential of off-target effects.”

    From Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [146]

    The Introduction defines cell and gene therapies, and the Management of challenging value chains section discusses transfection as a manufacturing step. Neither passage addresses CRISPR/Cas, non-viral template delivery, deletion of large genes, orthotopic placement, or off-target effects; searches for those terms found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, R. P., Ruck, S., Medcalf, N., & Rafiq, Q. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Harrison, Richard P.
Venue
Cytotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
1140-1151
ISSN
1465-3249 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2742829995
Cited by
72
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cytotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I017801/1)
  • Engineering, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (ETERM) Landscape fellowship grant
  • EPSRC Fellowships in Manufacturing grant (EP/K037099/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
distributed manufacturing, cell and gene therapy, regulatory challenges, personalized medicine, manufacturing technology, business model transformation
MeSH terms
Workforce, Biotechnology, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Socioeconomic Factors, Genetic Therapy, Health Care Sector, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review