CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Streptococcus mutans adhesion to fluoride varnishes and subsequent change in biofilm accumulation and acidogenicity

Chau, Ngoc Phuong Thanh, Pandit, Santosh, Jung, Ji-Eun, Jeon, Jae-Gyu·2014·Journal of Dentistry
DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate Streptococcus mutans adhesion to fluoride varnishes and subsequent change in biofilm accumulation and acidogenicity. Methods After producing fluoride varnish-coated hydroxyapatite discs using Fluor Protector (FP), Bifluorid 12 (BIF), Cavity Shield (CASH), or Flor-Opal Varnish White (FO), S. mutans biofilms were formed on the discs. To assess S. mutans adhesion to the discs, 4-h-old biofilms were analysed. To investigate the change in biofilm accumulation during subsequent biofilm formation, the biomass, colony forming units (CFU), and water-insoluble extracellular polysaccharides (EP) of 46-, 70-, and 94-h-old biofilms were analysed. To investigate the change in acidogenicity, pH values of the culture medium were determined during the experimental period. The amount of fluoride in the culture medium was also determined during the experimental period. Results BIF, CASH, and FO affected S. mutans adhesion (67-98% reduction) and subsequent biofilm accumulation in 46-, 70-, and 94-h-old biofilms. However, the reducing effect of the fluoride varnishes on the biomass, CFU count, water-insoluble EP amount, and acid production rate of the biofilms decreased as the biofilm age increased. These results may be related to the fluoride-release pattern of the fluoride varnishes. Of the fluoride varnishes tested, FO showed the highest reducing effect against the bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm accumulation. Conclusions Our findings…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Marsh, 2004, Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm, Caries Research, 38, 204, 10.1159/000077756 · DOI · Paper page
  2. van Houte, 1994, Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology, Journal of Dental Research, 73, 672, 10.1177/00220345940730031301 · DOI
  3. Beighton, 2005, The complex oral microflora of high-risk individuals and groups and its role in the caries process, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 33, 248, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00232.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Huis in 't Veld, 1979, Streptococcus mutans and dental caries in humans: a bacteriological and immunological study, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 45, 25, 10.1007/BF00400775 · DOI
  5. Loesche, 1986, Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay, Microbiological Reviews, 50, 353, 10.1128/mr.50.4.353-380.1986 · DOI
  6. Harper, 1984, Growth and acid tolerance of human dental plaque bacteria, Archives of Oral Biology, 29, 843, 10.1016/0003-9969(84)90015-3 · DOI
  7. Kuramitsu, 1993, Virulence factors of mutans streptococci: role of molecular genetics, Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, 4, 159, 10.1177/10454411930040020201 · DOI
  8. Bowen, 2011, Biology of Streptococcus mutans-derived glucosyltransferases: role in extracellular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms, Caries Research, 45, 69, 10.1159/000324598 · DOI
  9. Beltrán-Aguilar, 2000, Fluoride varnishes. A review of their clinical use, cariostatic mechanism, efficacy and safety, Journal of the American Dental Association, 131, 589, 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0232 · DOI
  10. Bawden, 1998, Fluoride varnish: a useful new tool for public health dentistry, Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 58, 266, 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1998.tb03007.x · DOI
  11. Autio-Gold, 2005, Fluoride varnishes for everyday practice, Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry, 17, 398
  12. Strohmenger, 2001, The use of fluoride varnishes in the prevention of dental caries: a short review, Oral Diseases, 7, 71, 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2001.70202.x · DOI
  13. Weintraub, 2006, Fluoride varnish efficacy in preventing early childhood caries, Journal of Dental Research, 85, 172, 10.1177/154405910608500211 · DOI
  14. Vivaldi-Rodriques, 2006, The effectiveness of a fluoride varnish in preventing the development of white spot lesions, World Journal of Orthodontics, 7, 138
  15. Lee, 2010, Comparison of remineralization effect of three topical fluoride regimens on enamel initial carious lesions, Journal of Dentistry, 38, 166, 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.10.002 · DOI
  16. Magalhães, 2008, Effect of a 4% titanium tetrafluoride (TiF4) varnish on demineralisation and remineralisation of bovine enamel in vitro, Journal of Dentistry, 36, 158, 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.12.001 · DOI
  17. Delbem, 2006, Effect of fluoridated varnish and silver diamine fluoride solution on enamel demineralization: pH-cycling study, Journal of Applied Oral Science, 14, 88, 10.1590/S1678-77572006000200005 · DOI
  18. Meurman, 1987, Effect of sodium and amine fluoride treatment on adsorption and ultrastructure of S. mutans and S. sanguis, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 95, 389
  19. Hayacibara, 2003, Effects of fluoride and aluminum from ionomeric materials on S. mutans biofilm, Journal of Dental Research, 82, 267, 10.1177/154405910308200405 · DOI
  20. Pandit, 2011, Effect of sodium fluoride on the virulence factors and composition of Streptococcus mutans biofilms, Archives of Oral Biology, 56, 643, 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Castioni, 1998, Current status in oral fluoride pharmacokinetics and implications the prophylaxis against dental caries, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 45, 101, 10.1016/S0939-6411(97)00083-0 · DOI
  22. Mason, 2010, Evaluation of salivary retention from a new high fluoride mouthrinse, Journal of Dentistry, 38, S30, 10.1016/S0300-5712(11)70006-9 · DOI
  23. Eakle, 2004, Salivary fluoride levels following application of fluoride varnish or fluoride rinse, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 32, 462, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00185.x · DOI
  24. Pandit, 2011, Evaluation of Streptococcus mutans biofilms formed on fluoride releasing and non fluoride releasing resin composites, Journal of Dentistry, 39, 780, 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.010 · DOI
  25. Lemos, 2010, Protocols to study the physiology of oral biofilms, Methods in Molecular Biology, 666, 87, 10.1007/978-1-60761-820-1_7 · DOI
  26. Jeon, 2009, Influences of naturally occurring agents in combination with fluoride on gene expression and structural organization of Streptococcus mutans in biofilms, BMC Microbiology, 9, 228, 10.1186/1471-2180-9-228 · DOI
  27. Koo, 2010, Exopolysaccharides produced by Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases modulate the establishment of microcolonies within multispecies biofilms, Journal of Bacteriology, 192, 3024, 10.1128/JB.01649-09 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Bowen, 2002, Do we need to be concerned about dental caries in the coming millennium?, Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, 13, 126, 10.1177/154411130201300203 · DOI
  29. Marsh, 2006, Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community-implications for health and disease, Biomedical Central Oral Health, 6, 14, 10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S14 · DOI · Paper page
  30. ElSalhy, 2012, Effects of xylitol mouthrinse on Streptococcus mutans, Journal of Dentistry, 40, 1151, 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.014 · DOI
  31. Fu, 2013, Effect of desensitising paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in vitro, Journal of Dentistry, 41, 619, 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.013 · DOI
  32. Dong, 2012, Effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobial agents on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 39, 390, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.01.009 · DOI
  33. Kokare, 2009, Biofilm: importance and applications, Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 8, 159
  34. Donlan, 2002, Biofilm: microbial life on surfaces, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 8, 881, 10.3201/eid0809.020063 · DOI
  35. Koo, 2006, Co-operative inhibition by fluoride and zinc of glucosyl transferase production and polysaccharide synthesis by mutans streptococci in suspension cultures and biofilms, FEMS Microbiology Letters, 254, 134, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00018.x · DOI
  36. Pandit, 2013, Relationship between fluoride concentration and activity against virulence factors and viability of a cariogenic biofilm: in vitro study, Caries Research, 47, 539, 10.1159/000348519 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Chau, N. P. T., Pandit, S., Jung, J.-E., & Jeon, J.-G.
Venue
Journal of Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
726-734
ISSN
0300-5712
DOI
10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.009
Cited by
40
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2013R1A1A2005048)
  • Chonbuk National University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review