The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fact or artifact: The impact of measurement errors on the farm size–productivity relationship
Abstract
This paper revisits the role of land measurement error in the inverse farm size and productivity relationship. By making use of data from a nationally representative household survey from Uganda, in which self-reported land size information is complemented by plot measurements collected using Global Position System devices, the authors reject the hypothesis that the inverse relationship may just be a statistical artifact linked to problems with land measurement error. In particular, the paper explores: (i) the determinants of the bias in land measurement, (ii) how this bias varies systematically with plot size and landholding, and (iii) the extent to which land measurement error affects the relative advantage of smallholders implied by the inverse relationship. The findings indicate that using an improved measure of land size strengthens the evidence in support of the existence of the inverse relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender, Agricultural Production, and the Theory of the Household
Udry, C. (1996) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/262050 · Cited by 1,261
African Agriculture in 50Years: Smallholders in a Rapidly Changing World?
Collier, P., & Dercon, S. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.001 · Cited by 727
Peasants and Dualism with or without Surplus Labor
Sen, A. K. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259198 · Cited by 706
The relation between farm size and farm productivity
Feder, G. (1985) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3878(85)90059-8 · Cited by 613
A theory of contractual structure in agriculture
Eswaran, M., & Kotwal, A. (1985) · American Economic Review · Cited by 594
Power, distortions, revolt and reform in agricultural land relations
Rosenzweig, M. R., Deininger, K., & Feder, G. (1995) · Handbook of development economics · Cited by 558
A TEST FOR RELATIVE EFFICIENCY AND APPLICATION TO INDIAN AGRICULTURE
Lau, L. J., & Yotopoulos, P. A. (1971) · American Economic Review · Cited by 461
Village and Household Economies in India's Semi-Arid Tropics
Walker, T. S., & Ryan, J. G. (1990) · Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) · Cited by 456
Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries
Crosson, P., Berry, R. A., & Cline, W. R. (1980) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146229 · Cited by 409
On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship
Barrett, C. B. (1996) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(96)00412-9 · Cited by 408
Cited by
Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C. B. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.010 · Cited by 594
The state of family farms in the world
Graeub, B. E., Chappell, M. J., Wittman, H., Ledermann, S., Kerr, R. B., & Gemmill-Herren, B. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012 · Cited by 543
Giller, K. E., Delaune, T., Silva, J. V., van Wijk, M., Hammond, J., Descheemaeker, K., van de Ven, G., Schut, A. G. T., Taulya, G., Chikowo, R., et al. (2021) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-021-01209-0 · Cited by 329
Higher yields and more biodiversity on smaller farms
Ricciardi, V., Mehrabi, Z., Wittman, H., James, D., & Ramankutty, N. (2021) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00699-2 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Carletto, C., Savastano, S., & Zezza, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Development Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 103
- Pages
- 254-261
- ISSN
- 0304-3878 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065547779
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 30.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fact or artifact: The impact of measurement errors on the farm size–productivity relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.03.004
- The paper
- Carletto, C., Savastano, S., & Zezza, A. (2013). Fact or artifact: The impact of measurement errors on the farm size–productivity relationship. Journal of Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.03.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.