Cited by 38Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Detection of asymptomatic drug-induced hypoglycemia using continuous glucose monitoring in older people - Systematic review

Open access
Mattishent, K., Loke, Y.K.·2018·Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Abstract

AIM We conducted a systematic review of the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in older patients, in order to consolidate the growing evidence base in this area. METHODS Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017068523). We searched SCI Web of Science, Ovid SP MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2010 to June 2017 for observational studies and randomized controlled trial of CGM in older patients (mean age 65 or older) with diabetes. We excluded studies that involved only hospitalized patients. Two reviewers independently extracted data blood sugar values (in particular, hypoglycemic episodes) captured with the use of CGM. We also assessed adverse events and acceptability of CGM. RESULTS After screening 901 abstracts, we included nine studies with a total of 989 older patients with diabetes. The CGM studies reveal that hypoglycemic episodes were occurring in a sizeable proportion (28-65%) of participants. Most (80-100%) of these episodes were asymptomatic, with some patients spending nearly 2 h per day in the hypoglycemic range. Older people with diabetes found CGM acceptable and experienced improved health-related well-being. CONCLUSION CGM frequently picks up asymptomatic hypoglycemic episodes in older patients with diabetes. Users of CGM report improved well-being, and reduction of diabetes-related stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.05.005

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies do not capture the level 1 and level 2 hypoglycemia that represent the vast majority of hypoglycemic events, and they also substantially underestimate level 3 hypoglycemia.

    “These studies do not capture the level 1 and level 2 hypoglycemia that represent the vast majority of hypoglycemic events, and they also substantially underestimate level 3 hypoglycemia (87,91,92).”

    From 6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. (2026) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Evidence Synthesis (§3.2; page unavailable) reports that 80–100% of hypoglycemic events in the reviewed studies were asymptomatic and likely would have gone unnoticed without continuous glucose monitoring. This supports the point that many events are missed, but the paper does not establish that missed events were specifically level 1 or level 2, or that level 3 hypoglycemia was substantially underestimated. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattishent, K., & Loke, Y. K.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Mattishent, K.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
805-812
ISSN
  • 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1056-8727
OpenAlex
W2803488437
Cited by
38
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer's Society (324 (AS-CTF-16-001))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, asymptomatic hypoglycemia, drug-induced hypoglycemia, older adults, diabetes mellitus, hypoglycemic episodes, health-related well-being, diabetes distress
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Asymptomatic Diseases, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review