Cited by 15Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

High number of hypoglycaemic episodes identified by CGM among home-dwelling older people with diabetes: an observational study in Norway

Open access
Fløde, Mari, Hermann, Monica, Haugstvedt, Anne, Søfteland, Eirik, Igland, Jannicke, Åsberg, Anders, Jenssen, Trond Geir, Graue, Marit·2023·BMC Endocrine Disorders

Abstract

Background: A scoping review from 2021 identified a lack of studies on the incidence, prevention and management of hypoglycaemia in home-dwelling older people with diabetes. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and duration of hypoglycaemic episodes measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in older people with diabetes who received home care and who were treated with glucose-lowering medications, and to compare the frequency and duration of hypoglycaemic episodes between subgroups of the study population according to demographic and clinical variables. Methods: This was an observational study investigating the occurrence of hypoglycaemia in people with diabetes aged ≥ 65 years. Data were collected using blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM, iPro2) for 5 consecutive days. Frequency and duration of hypoglycaemic episodes were assessed using a sensor glucose cut-off value of 3.9 mmol/L. A blood sample for measurement of HbA1c and creatinine-based eGFR (CKD-EPI) was obtained during the monitoring period. Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic patient records. Results: Fifty-six individuals were enrolled (median age 82 years and 52% were men). Of the 36 participants who were treated with insulin, 33% had at least one hypoglycaemic episode during the five-day period. Among 18 participants who neither used insulin nor sulfonylurea, but other glucose-lowering medications, 44% had at least one hypoglycaemicepisode. Of those with hypoglycaemic episodes, 86% lived alone. The median duration of the hypoglycaemia was 1 h and 25 min, ranging from 15 min to 8 h and 50 min. Conclusion: This study identified an unacceptably high number of unknown hypoglycaemic episodes among older home-dwelling people with diabetes receiving home care, even among those not using insulin or sulfonylurea. The study provides essential knowledge that can serve as a foundation to improve the treatment and care for this vulnerable patient group. The routines for glucose monitoring and other prevention tasks need to be considered more comprehensively, also, among those treated with glucose-lowering medications other than insulin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12902-023-01472-6

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An observational study of older adults with diabetes living in LTC facilities using CGM revealed a high prevalence of hypoglycemia both in people using insulin and in those using sulfonylureas, showing that this population is at increased risk for hypoglycemia.

    “Furthermore, an observational study of older adults with diabetes living in LTC facilities using CGM revealed a high prevalence of hypoglycemia both in people using insulin and in those using sulfonylureas, thus showing that this population of older adults in LTC facilities are at increased risk for hypoglycemia (141).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [141]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This population of older adults in PALTC facilities is at increased risk for hypoglycemia.

    “thus showing that this population of older adults in PALTC facilities are at increased risk for hypoglycemia (159,160).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [159]

    The Background states that older home-dwelling people with diabetes have an increased risk of hypoglycaemia, and the Conclusion reports many episodes among people receiving home care. The study did not examine older adults living in PALTC facilities, so it does not directly support the claim for that setting. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Additional studies of older adults with diabetes living in PALTC facilities using CGM revealed a high prevalence of hypoglycemia both in people using insulin and in those using sulfonylureas.

    “Additional studies of older adults with diabetes living in PALTC facilities using CGM revealed a high prevalence of hypoglycemia both in people using insulin and in those using sulfonylureas, thus showing that this population of older adults in PALTC facilities are at increased risk for hypoglycemia (159,160).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [159]

    The Results and Discussion (page not provided) report CGM-detected hypoglycaemia in 33% of insulin users. But the participants were home-dwelling older adults receiving home care, not residents of PALTC facilities. The Discussion says only one participant with hypoglycaemia in the non-insulin group used a sulfonylurea, so the paper does not establish a high prevalence among sulfonylurea users. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fløde, M., Hermann, M., Haugstvedt, A., Søfteland, E., Igland, J., Åsberg, A., Jenssen, T. G., & Graue, M.
Affiliations
  • Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Graue, Marit
Venue
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Published
2023-10-10
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
218-218
ISSN
1472-6823 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387496085
Cited by
15
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Endocrine Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Høgskulen på Vestlandet
  • Diabetesforbundet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
hypoglycemia, diabetes in older adults, home-dwelling older people, home care, continuous glucose monitoring, hypoglycaemic episodes, insulin, sulfonylureas, glucose-lowering medications, living alone, hypoglycemia prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review