Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 155Discourse Analysis in Language StudiesEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dimensions of difference: a comparison of university writing and IELTS writing

Moore, Tim, Morton, Janne·2005·Journal of English for Academic Purposes
DOI 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.001

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Deakin, 1997, IELTS in context: Issues in EAP for overseas students, EA Journal, 15, 7
  2. Lyons, 1977, Vol. 2

Cited by

See all 155

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Moore, T., & Morton, J.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Moore, Tim
ORCID
Morton, Janne
Venue
Journal of English for Academic Purposes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
43-66
ISSN
1475-1585 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.001
OpenAlex
W2044254936
Cited by
135
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
60.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of English for Academic Purposes (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
IELTS writing, college writing, English for academic purposes, writing rubrics, essay genre, exam preparation, writing curriculum, genre analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.