The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecotoxicological and health concerns of persistent coloring pollutants of textile industry wastewater and treatment approaches for environmental safety
Abstract
Abstract Textile industry wastewater (TIWW) is considered as one of the worst polluters of our precious water and soil ecologies. It causes carcinogenic, mutagenic, genotoxic, cytotoxic and allergenic threats to living organisms. TIWW contains a variety of persistent coloring pollutants (dyes), formaldehyde, phthalates, phenols, surfactants, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), pentachlorophenol and different heavy metals like lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), zinc (Zn) and nickel (Ni) etc. TIWW is characterized by high dye content, high pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total dissolved solids (TDS), total suspended solids (TSS), total organic carbon (TOC), chlorides and sulphates. Thus, requires adequate treatment before its final discharge into the water bodies to protect public health and environment. The treatment of TIWW is a major challenge as there is no particular economically feasible treatment method capable to adequately treat TIWW. Therefore, there is a need to develop a novel, cost-effective and eco-friendly technology for the effective treatment of TIWW. This review paper emphasizes on the different textile industry processes, wastewater generation, its nature and chemical composition, environmental impacts and health hazards and treatment approaches available for TIWW treatment. It also presents various analytical techniques used to detect and characterize TIWW pollutants and their metabolites, challenges, key issues and future prospectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans
Carter, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.33.1.98-b · Cited by 3,456
A Critical Review on Textile Wastewater Treatments: Possible Approaches
Holkar, C. R., Jadhav, A. J., Pinjari, D. V., Mahamuni, N. M., & Pandit, A. B. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.090 · Cited by 1,927
Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Programming Languages and Operating Systems
(2015) · doi:10.1145/2818302 · Cited by 1,628
Low cost adsorbents for the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater
Ali, I., Asim, M., & Khan, T. A. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.028 · Cited by 1,498
Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2016) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x · Cited by 1,401
Sepehri, A., & Sarrafzadeh, M.-H. (2018) · Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2018.04.006 · Cited by 1,108
Towards sustainable wastewater treatment by using microbial fuel cells-centered technologies
Li, W.-W., Yu, H.-Q., & He, Z. (2013) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee43106a · Cited by 906
Biological Methods for Textile Dye Removal from Wastewater: A Review
Bhatia, D., Sharma, N. R., Singh, J., & Kanwar, R. S. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2017.1393263 · Cited by 816
Removal of colorants from wastewater: A review on sources and treatment strategies
Pavithra, K. G., P., S. K., V., J., & P., S. R. (2019) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.02.011 · Cited by 634
Sepehri, A., Sarrafzadeh, M.-H., & Avateffazeli, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119164 · Cited by 632
Cited by
Al-Tohamy, R., Ali, S. S., Li, F., Okasha, K. M., Mahmoud, Y. A.-G., Elsamahy, T., Jiao, H., Fu, Y., & Sun, J. (2022) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160 · Cited by 3,479
Islam, T., Repon, M. R., Islam, T., Sarwar, Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-24398-3 · Cited by 837
Performance evaluation of dye wastewater treatment technologies: A review
Solayman, H. M., Hossen, M. A., Abd Aziz, A., Yahya, N. Y., Leong, K. H., Sim, L. C., Monir, M. U., & Zoh, K.-D. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2023.109610 · Cited by 658
A review on microplastic emission from textile materials and its reduction techniques
Periyasamy, A. P., & Tehrani-Bagha, A. (2022) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109901 · Cited by 346
Hamad, H. N., & Idrus, S. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14040783 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Kishor, R., Purchase, D., Saratale, G. D., Saratale, R. G., Ferreira, L. F. R., Bilal, M., Chandra, R., & Bharagava, R. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105012
- ISSN
- 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
- 2213-3437
- OpenAlex
- W3116443628
- Cited by
- 1,118
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 51.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecotoxicological and health concerns of persistent coloring pollutants of textile industry wastewater and treatment approaches for environmental safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jece.2020.105012
- The paper
- Kishor, R., Purchase, D., Saratale, G. D., Saratale, R. G., Ferreira, L. F. R., Bilal, M., Chandra, R., & Bharagava, R. N. (2021). Ecotoxicological and health concerns of persistent coloring pollutants of textile industry wastewater and treatment approaches for environmental safety. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.105012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
