The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing slope homogeneity in large panels
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a modi?ed version of Swamy’s test of slope homogeneity for panel data models where the cross section dimension (N) could be large relative to the time series dimension (T). The proposed test exploits the cross section dispersion of individual slopes weighted by their relative precision. In the case of models with strictly exogenous regressors and normally distributed errors, the test is shown to have a standard normal distribution as (N, T) j ? 8. Under non-normal errors and in the case of stationary dynamic models, the condition on the relative expansion rates of N and T for the test to be valid is given by vN/T ? 0, as (N, T) j ? 8. Using Monte Carlo experiments, it is shown that the test has the correct size and satisfactory power in panels with strictly exogenous regressors for various combinations of N and T. For autoregressive (AR) models the proposed test performs well for moderate values of the root of the autoregressive process. But for AR models with roots near unity a bias-corrected bootstrapped version of the test is proposed which performs well even if N is large relative to T. The proposed cross section dispersion tests are applied to testing the homogeneity of slopes in autoregressive models of individual earnings using the PSID data. The results show statistically signi?cant evidence of slope heterogeneity in the earnings dynamics, even when individuals with similar educational backgrounds are considered as sub-sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Self-citationHsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Cited by
Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Majeed, A., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Muhammad, S. (2020) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817 · Cited by 773
Dong, K., Hochman, G., Zhang, Y., Sun, R., Li, H., & Liao, H. (2018) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.017 · Cited by 700
Green finance, fintech and environmental protection: evidence from China
Muganyi, T., Yan, L., & Sun, H.-P. (2021) · Environmental Science and Ecotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2021.100107 · Cited by 626
Le, H. P., & Ozturk, I. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2 · Cited by 528
Ma, Q., Tariq, M., Mahmood, H., & Khan, Z. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101910 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Hashem Pesaran, M., & Yamagata, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Econometrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-93
- ISSN
- 0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123095200
- Cited by
- 5,954
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
- The paper
- Hashem Pesaran, M., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.