The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of negligence, intention, and outcome on children’s moral judgments
Open accessAbstract
Piaget (1932) and subsequent researchers have reported that young children's moral judgments are based more on the outcomes of actions than on the agents' intentions. The current study investigated whether negligence might also influence these judgments and explain children's apparent focus on outcome. Children (3-8 years of age) and adults (N=139) rated accidental actions in which the valences of intention, negligence, and outcome were varied systematically. Participants of all ages were influenced primarily by intention, and well-intentioned actions were also evaluated according to negligence and outcome. Only two young children based their judgments solely on outcome. It is suggested that previous studies have underestimated children's use of intention because outcome and negligence have been confounded. Negative consequences are considered to be important because children assume that they are caused by negligence. The findings indicate that young children can show sophisticated understanding of the roles of intention and negligence in moral judgments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, new research has also shown that when children are given information about outcome, intentions and negligence, that they are influenced strongly by intentions in making punishment judgments (Nobes, et al., 2009).”
From The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind (2011) · cites this paper as Nobes, et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“This is because children view punishment as more acceptable when a transgression has negative rather than neutral (or positive) intentions (Nobes, et al., 2009).”
From The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind (2011) · cites this paper as Nobes, et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“Additionally, recent research suggests that children and adults do use information about an actor’s negligence in making moral judgments and assessments of punishment acceptability (Nobes, et al., 2009).”
From The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind (2011) · cites this paper as Nobes, et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
A Handbook of Child Psychology
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/130331a0 · Cited by 10,133
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.
Feldman, F., & Mackie, J. L. (1979) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184791 · Cited by 5,076
The Moral Judgment Of The Child
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009681 · Cited by 4,409
The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention
Eggleston, S. J., & Turiel, E. (1985) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121515 · Cited by 2,645
Turiel, E. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0313 · Cited by 2,156
Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children.
Meltzoff, A. N. (1995) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.838 · Cited by 2,087
Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.403 · Cited by 1,462
Hart, H. L. A., & Gardner, J. B. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001 · Cited by 1,146
PUNISHMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY: ESSAYS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF LAW
Cherry, C. (1969) · Philosophical Books · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1969.tb01474.x · Cited by 891
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–135 of 135
Two Theories of Moral Cognition
Haas, J. (2020) · The International library of ethics, law and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5_4 · Cited by 2
Intellectually Disabled Rape Survivors' Perceptions of Morality and Consequences of the Crime
Pillay, A. L. (2010) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.110.c.1119-1124 · Cited by 2
The effect of cognitive load on intent-based moral judgmentPreprint
Martin, J. D., Buon, M., & Cushman, F. A. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/em9gx · Cited by 2
Unmasking Moral Hypocrisy: How Preschoolers Perceive and Judge Moral Hypocrites
Myślińska‐Szarek, K., & Baryła, W. (2024) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13580 · Cited by 1
Which Matters More: Intention or Outcome? The Asymmetry of Moral Blame and Moral Praise
Li, Z.-M., Xiao, L., & Sun, H.-Y. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15091265 · Cited by 1
Inter-group trade-off between intentions and outcomes in children’s forgiveness
Yang, Q., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z., & Cheng, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1720622 · Cited by 1
Murray, S. F., Guzy, D., & Amaya, S. (2026) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672261444067 · Cited by 1
INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED RAPE SURVIVORS’ PERCEPTIONS OF MORALITY AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE CRIME1
Pillay, A. L. (2010) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/02.07.13.15.16.pms.110.c.1119-1124 · Cited by 1
Siegler, R. S., Saffran, J. R., Gershoff, E. T., & Eisenberg, N. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-62772-3_14 · Cited by 1
COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE PROCESSES IN CHILDREN’S THIRD-PARTY PUNISHMENTPreprint
Arini, R. L., Aljure, J. B., Guerra, N. B., González, C. B., Alba, E. F., Fernández, N. S., Ingram, G., Wiggs, L. D., & Kenward, B. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zxyjw · Cited by 1
Children's Use of Trait Information in Their Intention Ascription and Moral Judgments of Others
Gardiner, S. (2017) · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-12115 · Cited by 1
The Development of Intent-based Epistemic TrustPreprint
Margoni, F., & Nava, E. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/btazs · Cited by 1
Krämer, T. (2013) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Yuan, M. (2014) · The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)
Payir, A. (2016) · NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Crime, But Not Punishment? Children are More Lenient When the 'Spirit of the Law' is UnbrokenPreprint
Bregant, J., Wellbery, I., & Shaw, A. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2994584
La comprensión moral de situaciones accidentales y deliberadas en escolares con autismo
Molina, I. G. (2019) · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · doi:10.6035/14109.2019.209808
Variación intencional en tareas de Teoría de la Mente Moralmente relevante (MoToM)
Peña, J. G., Sierra, D., Gallego, F., & Artunduaga, K. (2020) · Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicología · doi:10.18270/chps..v18i2.3050
Sound wave travel times in plage areas: The effect of abnormal granulation
Petrovay, K., Erdélyi, R., & Thompson, M. J. (2006)
Woods, R. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118326176.refs
Children hold owners responsible when property causes harmPreprint
Bowman‐Smith, C. K., Goulding, B. W., & Friedman, O. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/c6rmy
Moral Luck and the Roles of Outcome and Negligence in Judgments of Accidental HarmsPreprint
Nobes, G., Panagiotaki, G., & Martin, J. W. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4109939
Beyond behavior: the penitence congruity effect among children
Paruzel‐Czachura, M., & Domurat, A. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05270-0
Myślińska‐Szarek, K., Baryła, W., & Wojciszke, B. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4875961
Repeated Transgressions Promote Costly Third‐Party Punishment in 6‐Year‐Olds
Toda, N., Toda, R., & Kanakogi, Y. (2025) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/sode.12796
Tobia, K. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009170901.012
Bregant, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009170901.024
Teachers’ Harmful Behaviors Toward Students: Understanding the Role of Judgment and Observation
Sack, J. K., Wang, Y., Callahan, C. J., & Horn, S. S. (2025) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1080/15388220.2025.2502626
How does reasoning influence intentionality attribution in the case of side effects?
Trotti, N. M. A. A., Zucchelli, M. M., Pavan, A., Piccardi, L., & Nori, R. (2025) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-025-01300-w
Akar, T., & Aksoy, A. B. (2025) · Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.35675/befdergi.1560295
On the Law of the Household: The Principles Used by Parents in Disciplining Their Children
Shavell, S. (2026) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/734034
Li, D., Zang, L., & Zhao, X. (2026) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.70036
Yuen, F., Black, A. K., & Hamlin, J. K. (2026) · Frontiers in Developmental Psychology · doi:10.3389/fdpys.2026.1812110
Metadata
- Authors
- Nobes, G., Panagiotaki, G., & Pawson, C.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- University of East London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nobes, Gavin
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 382-397
- ISSN
- 0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148468027
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- moral judgment, children's moral reasoning, intention, negligence, outcomes, accidental actions, moral valence, developmental differences, blame attribution
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Morals, Motivation, Social Perception, Intention, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review