Cited by 52Language Development and DisordersReading and Literacy DevelopmentMemory Processes and Influences

Enhanced recognition and recall of new words in 7- and 12-year-olds following a period of offline consolidation

Open access
Brown, Helen, Weighall, Anna, Henderson, Lisa M., Gareth Gaskell, M.·2012·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Recent studies of adults have found evidence for consolidation effects in the acquisition of novel words, but little is known about whether such effects are found developmentally. In two experiments, we familiarized children with novel nonwords (e.g., biscal) and tested their recognition and recall of these items. In Experiment 1, 7-year-olds were then retested on either the same day or the following day to examine changes in performance after a short delay compared with a longer delay that included sleep. Experiment 2 used two age groups (7- and 12-year-olds), with all participants being retested 24h later. The 12-year-olds accurately recognized the novel nonwords immediately after exposure, as did the 7-year-olds in Experiment 2 (but not in Experiment 1), suggesting generally good initial rates of learning. Experiment 1 revealed improved recognition of the novel nonwords after both short (3- to 4-h) and longer (24-h) delays. In contrast, recall was initially poor but showed improvements only when children were retested 24h later, not after a 3- to 4-h delay. Similar improvements were observed in both age groups despite better overall performance in 12-year-olds. We argue that children, like adults, exhibit offline consolidation effects on the formation of novel phonological representations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.010

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several other studies demonstrated profits from sleep in children aged 7-14 for word memories and integration of novel words into lexical knowledge.

    “Similarly, several other studies demonstrated profits from sleep in children between 7 and 14 years of age for word memories as well as for the integration of novel words into lexical knowledge (141, 530, 945).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [141]

    The General Discussion reports improved recall of novel words after a 24-hour interval that included sleep, but says the study cannot rule out elapsed time rather than sleep as the cause. It also reports lexical competition immediately after learning, with no apparent increase after offline consolidation. Thus this paper supports improved word recall, but not a demonstrated sleep benefit for integrating novel words into lexical knowledge. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In 7- and 12-year-old children, memory for novel words profited from an off-line consolidation interval involving sleep.

    “Similarly, in 7-and 12-yr-old children, memory for novel words profited from an off-line consolidation interval involving sleep (141).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [141]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Altmann, G. T. M. (1997). The ascent of Babel: An exploration of language, mind, and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Booth, A. E. (2009). Causal supports for early word learning. Child Development, 80(4), 1243-1250.
  3. Carey, S. (1978). The child as a word learner. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan & A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality (pp. 264-293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 pictureable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 12, 563-576.
  5. Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. I. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 165-182.
  6. Church, B. A., & Fischer, C. (1998). Long-term auditory word priming in preschoolers: Implicit memory support for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 523-542.
  7. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505.
  8. Davis, M. H., Di Betta, A. M., Macdonald, M. J. E., & Gaskell, M. G. (2009). Learning and consolidation of novel spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
  9. Dockrell, J. E., Braisby, N., & Best, R. M. (2007). Children's acquisition of science terms: Simple exposure is insufficient. [Article]. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 577-594.
  10. Dumay, N., Gaskell, M. G., & Feng, X. (2004). A day in the life of a spoken word. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
  11. Fischer, S., Wilhelm, I., & Born, J. (2007). Developmental differences in sleep's role for implicit off-line learning: Comparing children with adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(2), 214-227.
  12. French, R. M. (1999). Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 128-135.
  13. Garlock, V. M., Walley, A. C., & Metsala, J. L. (2001). Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 468-492.
  14. Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2003a). Effects of vocabulary acquisition on lexical competition in speech perception and production. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th ICPhS Conference.
  15. Horst, J. S., McMurray, B., & Samuelson, L. K. (2006). Online processing is essential for learning: Understanding fast mapping and word learning in a dynamic connectionist architecture. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
  16. Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2008). Fast mapping but poor retention by 24-month-old infants. Infancy, 13(2), 128-157.
  17. Houston, D. M., Tincoff, R., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). 7.5-month olds' memory for words after a 1-week delay. In D. M. Houston, A. Seidl, G. Hollich, E. Johnson & A. Jusczyk (Eds.), Jusczyk Lab Final Report
  18. Lyons, A. W., Teer, P., & Rubensten, H. (1978). Age-of-acquisition and word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 1790187.
  19. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. . Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 576-585.
  20. Mattys, S. L., & Clark, J. H. (2002). Lexical activity in speech processing: Evidence from pause detection. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(3), 343-359.
  21. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning-systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. . Psychological Review, 102(3), 419-457.
  22. McGregor, K. K., Rohlfing, K. J., Bean, A., & Marschner, E. (2009). Gesture as a support for word learning: The case of under. Journal of Child Language, 36, 807-828.
  23. Menon, V., Boyett-Anderson, J. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2005). Maturation of medial temporal lobe response and connectivity during memory encoding. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 379-385.
  24. Metsala, J. L., Stavrinos, D., & Walley, A. C. (2009). Children's spoken word recognition and contributions to phonological awareness and nonword repetition: A 1-year follow-up. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 101-121.
  25. Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  26. Morrison, C. A., Chappell, T. D., & Ellis, A. (1997). Age-of-acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 528-559.
  27. Munson, B., Swenson, C. L., & Manthei, S. C. (2005). Lexical and phonological organization in children: Evidence from repetition tasks. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 48(1), 108-124.
  28. Newman, R. S. (2008). The level of detail in infants' word learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 229-232.
  29. Norman, K. A., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychological Review, 110(4), 611-646.
  30. O'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108(2), 311- 345.
  31. Ojima, S., Matsuba-Kurita, H., Nakamura, N., & Hagiwara, H. (2011). The acceleration of spoken-word processing in children's native-language acquistion: an ERP cohort study. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 790-799.
  32. Plihal, W., & Born, J. (1999). Effects of early and late nocturnal sleep on priming and spatial memory. Psychophysiology, 36(5), 571-582.
  33. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. [Article]. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 21(3), 785-794.
  34. Sekerina, I. A., & Brooks, P. J. (2007). Eye movements during spoken word recognition in Russian children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98, 20-45.
  35. Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., Holmes, C. J., Jernigan, T. L., & Toga, A. W. (1999). In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nature Neuroscience, 2(10), 859-861.
  36. Spiegel, C., & Halberda, J. (2011). Rapid fast-mapping abilities in 2-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(1), 132-140.
  37. Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Davis, C. J. (2006). The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 598-605.
  38. Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44(6), 1321-1337.
  39. Storkel, H. L., & Hoover, J. R. (2011). The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 38, 628-643.
  40. Storkel, H. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2011). The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 191-211.
  41. Swingley, D., Pinto, J. P., & Fernald, A. (1999). Continuous processing in word recognition at 24 months. Cognition, 71(2), 73-108.
  42. Tamminen, J., & Gaskell, M. G. (2008). Newly learned spoken words show long-term lexical competition effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 361-371.
  43. Tamminen, J., Payne, J. D., Stickgold, R., Wamsley, E. J., & Gaskell, M. G. (2010). Sleep Spindle Activity is Associated with the Integration of New Memories and Existing Knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(43), 14356-14360.
  44. Walley, A. C. (1993). The role of vocabulary development in children's spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13, 286-350.
  45. Wilhelm, I., Diekelmann, S., & Born, J. (2008). Sleep in children improves memory performance on declarative but not procedural tasks. Learning & Memory, 15(5), 373- 377.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, H., Weighall, A., Henderson, L. M., & Gareth Gaskell, M.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
56-72
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054661097
Cited by
52
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust (F/00 224/ AO)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/E015263/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
offline consolidation, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, novel word learning, nonword recognition, phonological representation, child language acquisition, developmental differences, memory delay
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Female, Humans, Language Development, Learning, Male, Mental Recall, Reinforcement, Psychology, Time Factors, Vocabulary, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review