Cited by 67Reading and Literacy DevelopmentWriting and Handwriting EducationChildren's Physical and Motor Development

The effect of fine motor skills, handwriting, and typing on reading development

Open access
Suggate, Sebastian P., Karle, Viktoria L., Kipfelsberger, Tanja, Stoeger, Heidrun·2023·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Discussions on the contribution of motor skills and processes to learning to read has a long history. Previous work is essentially divided into two separate strands, namely the contributions of fine motor skills (FMS) to reading and the influence of writing versus typing. In the current 2 × 2 × 3 mixed, single-blind, and randomly assigned experiment, we tested both strands together. A total of 87 children learned to decode pseudowords in either typing or writing conditions in which their FMS were either impaired or not. Decoding gains were measured at pretest, posttest, and follow-up, with FMS and working memory included as participant variable predictors. Findings indicated that FMS and working memory predicted decoding gains. Importantly, children performed best when typing if in the impaired FMS condition. Results have implications for motor representation theories of writing and for instruction of children with FMS impairments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105674

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The greater focus of attention involved in handwriting contributes to a more intense level of cognitive processing.

    “The greater focus of attention involved in handwriting also contributes to a more intense level of cognitive processing [39].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suggate, S. P., Karle, V. L., Kipfelsberger, T., & Stoeger, H.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Suggate, Sebastian P.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
232
Pages
105674
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4361256309
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3
FWCI
23.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (STO 481/10-1, SU 766/7-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
fine motor skills, handwriting, typing, reading development, pseudoword decoding, working memory, children
MeSH terms
Child, Handwriting, Humans, Motor Skills, Psychomotor Performance, Reading, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review