Cited by 118Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Rights and ReformsIndigenous Cultures and History

Indigenous land rights and deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon

BenYishay, Ariel, Heuser, Silke, Runfola, Daniel, Trichler, Rachel·2017·Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.07.008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results are robust to testing only on BenYishay et al.'s sample.

    “Our results are robust to testing only on their sample; we report the results in SI Appendix, Table S5 and Fig. S14.”
  • BenYishay et al. (27) rely on the orthogonality in the timing of demarcation, showing that the timing of these processes seems to be somewhat random and not caused by observable characteristics of the territories.

    “BenYishay et al. (27) also rely on the orthogonality in the timing of demarcation, proving that the timing of these processes seems to be somewhat random and not caused by observable characteristics of the territories.”

    From Collective property rights reduce deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (2020) · cites this paper as BenYishay et al. [27]

  • Proximity to roads, rivers, and mines and elevation and rainfall are significant predictors of deforestation.

    “Existing literature has found that proximity to roads, rivers, and mines and elevation and rainfall are significant predictors of deforestation”
  • The results still hold when tested on the sample of territories included in the BenYishay et al. (27) study.

    “Our results still hold, and are reported in SI Appendix, Table S5 and Fig. S14.”

    From Collective property rights reduce deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (2020) · cites this paper as BenYishay et al. [27]

  • Studies in Brazil and Peru found reductions in deforestation after receiving property titles.

    “studies in Brazil [134] and Peru [135] found reductions in 486 deforestation after receiving property titles.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BenYishay, A., Heuser, S., Runfola, D., & Trichler, R.
Affiliations
William & Mary (US)
Corresponding author
BenYishay, Ariel
Venue
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
86
Pages
29-47
ISSN
0095-0696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2737151197
Cited by
118
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
indigenous land rights, deforestation, land formalization, Amazon, forest cover, indigenous peoples, forest protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review