Partnerships to prevent deforestation in the Amazon
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Leakage under the two agreements from properties that enrolled earlier to properties that enrolled later was responsible for the overall zero effect of the policy.
“Leakage under the two 549 agreements from properties that enrolled earlier to properties that enrolled later was responsible for the 550 overall zero effect of the policy [155].”
From A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome (2023) · cites this paper as [155]
G4 and TAC cattle ranching agreements did not provide additionality in preventing deforestation.
“548 ranching agreements did not provide additionality in preventing deforestation.”
From A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome (2023) · cites this paper as [155]
Cites
Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2999630 · Cited by 2,286 · see citing works
Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H., & Alencar, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246663 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome
Hänggli, A., Levy, S. A., Armenteras, D., Bovolo, C. I., Brandão, J., Rueda, X., & Garrett, R. D. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acd408 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jung, S., & Polasky, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jung, Suhyun
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 92
- Pages
- 498-516
- ISSN
- 0095-0696 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899100613
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Minnesota
- Natural Capital Project
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
- Keywords
- deforestation prevention, Cargill, The Nature Conservancy, private sector partnerships, environmental law enforcement, Brazilian Amazon, credit constraints, smallholder farmers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
