Cited by 454Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasECG Monitoring and AnalysisHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

A comparison of commonly used QT correction formulae: The effect of heart rate on the QTc of normal ECGs

Luo, Shen, Michler, Kurt, Johnston, Paul, Macfarlane, Peter W.·2004·Journal of Electrocardiology

Abstract

The corrected QT interval (QTc) is widely used in pharmaceutical studies and clinical practice. Bazett's QT correction formula is still the most popular, despite Simonson's warning in 1961 that it could not be recommended. Other QTc formulae, e.g. Fridericia, Framingham, and Hodges, are also used. This study compares these four formulae using 10,303 normal ECGs recorded from four US hospitals. QT intervals were measured by the same computer program on ECGs confirmed by physicians. The distributions of QTc based on Fridericia, Framingham, and Hodges formulae were similar but Bazett's was significantly wider. The global group QTc-heart rate (HR) correlation coefficients were calculated as Bazett 0.33, Fridericia 0.24, Framingham 0.26, and Hodges 0.11, with the uncorrected QT-HR correlation being 0.82. Overall by far, Hodges QTc is significantly less correlated with HR compared to the others. Certain subgroup correlations of gender and low, mid, or high HR show that one individual formula can out-perform the others, whereby automated selection of QT correction formula based on the patient's HR and gender could be implemented as another option in products. The upper normal limits of corrected QTc were determined by excluding the top 2% from the global distribution charts as follows: Bazett 483 ms, Fridericia 460 ms, Framingham 457 ms, and Hodges 457 ms. Whether for males and/or females, the middle range of HR from 60 to 99 bpm has similar upper normal limits of QTc for all formulae except Bazett. Numerous references recommend 420 to 440 ms as the threshold for reporting prolonged QTc when using Bazett's formula. Based on this database, 30% of apparently normal ECGs would be reported as having abnormal QT intervals for the 440 ms threshold, or 10% if 460 ms is chosen, compared to <2% for the other formulae. It was also noted that QT has a linear trend with HR but not with RR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2004.08.030

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurement of the QTc interval is not without difficulties, and at least six alternative methods of rate correction are available.

    “Finally, it should be noted that measurement of the QTc interval is not without difficulties, and at least six alternative methods of rate correction are available [83, 149].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, S., Michler, K., Johnston, P., & Macfarlane, P. W.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Luo, Shen
Venue
Journal of Electrocardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
37
Pages
81-90
ISSN
0022-0736 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005426535
Cited by
454
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Electrocardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
Bazett formula, Fridericia formula, Framingham formula, Hodges formula, heart rate, QT interval, normal ECG, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Bradycardia, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Sinoatrial Node, Software, Tachycardia, Sinus, Linear Models, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review