Cited by 65Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMuscle activation and electromyography studiesSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Muscle activation imbalance and low-back injury in varsity athletes

Reeves, N. Peter, Cholewicki, Jacek, Silfies, Sheri P.·2006·Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Abstract

There are conflicting findings in the literature regarding erector spinae activation imbalance in people with low-back pain (LBP). Some studies have found asymmetric recruitment between muscle pairs in people with LBP, whilst other studies have not; some reported people with LBP recruit more lumbar muscles whilst other have reported greater thoracic activity. Using 242 varsity athletes, EMG activity of thoracic and lumbar erector spinae pairs was recorded during an isometric trunk extension. Activation imbalance among muscle pairs and levels was compared between athletes with and without a history of low-back injury (HxLBI). There were no group differences in the imbalance between sides, but the HxLBI group had greater activation imbalance between lumbar and thoracic levels than the No HxLBI group. Activation imbalance between levels was similar for individuals with No HxLBI and those who sustained first time injury suggesting that imbalance does not cause LBI. There was no difference between the athletes with single and multiple episode LBI, nor between short and long symptom duration suggesting that the presence of imbalance is not an impairment. Interestingly, activation imbalance occurred in both directions, meaning more thoracic activity for some, and more lumbar activity for others, which might be a functional adaptation related to pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.07.008

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reeves, N. P., Cholewicki, J., & Silfies, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Cholewicki, Jacek
Venue
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
264-272
ISSN
1050-6411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136978943
Cited by
65
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR046844, 1R01 AR46844)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
low back injury, erector spinae, thoracic erector spinae, lumbar erector spinae, low back pain, varsity athletes, functional adaptation, asymmetry
MeSH terms
Adult, Athletic Injuries, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Male, Students, Low Back Pain, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review