Cited by 40Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

Responding to Mental Health Emergencies: Implementation of an Innovative Telehealth Service in Rural and Remote New South Wales, Australia

Saurman, Emily, Perkins, David, Roberts, Russell, Roberts, Andrew, Patfield, Martyn, Lyle, David·2011·Journal of Emergency Nursing

Abstract

Introduction Mental health is a national priority in Australia, and the need is greatest where access to specialist care is poorest, in the rural and remote regions of the nation. The Mental Health Emergency Care-Rural Access Project (MHEC) was developed to provide 24-hour access to mental health specialists in rural and remote New South Wales using video conferencing equipment.Method An evaluation of the service activity of MHEC using a concurrent mixed methods approach.Results Use of the service increased from a low base to around 60 video assessments per month at the end of the study period. Use of video assessments was greatest in the remote zone (30.7 video assessments/10,000 population/year). The number of people referred to a mental health inpatient unit declined (50 fewer patients, representing a decrease from 73% to 52% of all admissions between 2008 and 2009). Both patients and providers found the service helpful. Most patients (81%) stated that they would recommend or use the service again.Discussion This service is well positioned to have an increasing effect on emergency nursing and patient outcomes, as well as potentially on transportations. Continued use of MHEC suggests that video conference technology is acceptable and offers responsive specialist emergency mental health care to rural and remote communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jen.2010.11.005

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saurman, E., Perkins, D., Roberts, R., Roberts, A., Patfield, M., & Lyle, D.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Emergency Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
453-459
ISSN
0099-1767 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116510231
Cited by
40
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Emergency Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSW Ministry of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychiatric emergencies, telemedicine, videoconferencing, rural mental health services, remote communities, emergency nursing, service implementation, New South Wales
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Emergencies, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Mental Health, New South Wales, Organizational Innovation, Quality of Health Care, Program Evaluation, Emergency Nursing, Telemedicine, Rural Health Services, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review