Cited by 45Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth, Medicine and Society

Lived experience of involuntary transport under mental health legislation

Bradbury, Joanne, Hutchinson, Marie, Hurley, John, Stasa, Helen·2017·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Police have historically been responsible for transporting people during a mental health crisis in Australia. A major change to the New South Wales (NSW) Mental Health Act (MHA) in 2007 expanded the range of coercive transportation agencies to include NSW Ambulance (paramedics) and NSW Health (mental health nurses). Anecdotal reports, however, describe a lack of clarity around how these changes should be implemented in practice. This research aims to explore this lack of clarity through qualitative analysis of interviews with people with the lived experience of involuntary transport under the MHA. Sixteen interviews were conducted; most (n = 14) interviews in northern NSW regions: six with people who had been transported (consumers), four with carers, and six with service providers (two police, one paramedic, and three mental health nurses). For consumers and carers, the police response was often perceived as too intense, particularly if the person was not violent. Carers were often conflicted by having to call for emergency intervention. Service providers were frustrated by a lack of a coordinated interagency response, resourcing issues, delays at emergency departments, and lack of adequate training. A central theme across all groups was the importance of communication styles. As one participant (consumer) said: 'Everybody needs a lesson in kindness'. All groups agreed that high-risk situations necessitate police involvement. However, invocation of the MHA during a high-risk situation is fraught with stress and difficulties, leaving little room for empathetic communications. Effective and diverse, evidence-based, early intervention strategies - both consensual and non-consensual - are necessary to reduce the requirement for police involvement in mental health transports.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/inm.12284

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradbury, J., Hutchinson, M., Hurley, J., & Stasa, H.
Affiliations
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Bradbury, Joanne
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-29
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
580-592
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W2559115268
Cited by
45
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government's Collaborative Research Networks programme
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
mental health law, paramedics, psychiatric nurses, lived experience, caregivers, inter-agency coordination, communication styles, early intervention, emergency department delays
MeSH terms
Allied Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Interviews as Topic, New South Wales, Transportation of Patients, Police

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review