Is everyone hot in the city? Spatial pattern of land surface temperatures, land cover and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics in Baltimore, MD
Abstract
Urban heat island effect refers to the phenomenon that ambient air and surface temperatures in urban areas are several degrees higher than surrounding rural areas. Higher temperatures not only impact the comfort of urban dwellers, but also increase energy use, ozone production, and the risk of death for humans in a heat wave. Our research focuses on the variation in land surface temperature in the Gywnns Fall Watershed, Maryland. We found that land surface temperature is highly variable spatially, resulting in "hotspots" within the heat island. We further explore how this temperature variation relates to social factors on the scale of the census-based block group. We show that land surface temperature is statistically higher in block groups that are characterized by low income, high poverty, less education, more ethnic minorities, more elderly people and greater risk of crime. These variables were mapped to evaluate the spatial relationship of land surface temperatures to social factors. This spatially explicit approach facilitates identification of specific areas to prioritize for heat prevention and intervention efforts. We demonstrate, through an exercise, how incorporating data on land surface temperature and social factors into heat intervention strategies could contribute to efficient allocation of limited resources and services. The exercise also indicates where heat prevention efforts, such as tree-planting programs, are most needed to help reduce heat exposure and moderate the urban heat island effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research linking intracity differences in heat exposure to sociodemographic factors has typically been done in an ad hoc manner for a small number of individual cities.
“Instead, research linking intracity differences in heat exposure to sociodemographic factors has typically been done in an ad hoc manner for a small number of individual cities23,29–32.”
From Disproportionate exposure to urban heat island intensity across major US cities (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Spatial patterns of natural hazards mortality in the United States
Borden, K. A., & Cutter, S. L. (2008) · International Journal of Health Geographics · doi:10.1186/1476-072x-7-64 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Kinney, P. L., O’Neill, M. S., Bell, M. L., & Schwartz, J. (2008) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.08.001 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Urban Heat Island: Implications for Health in a Changing Environment
Heaviside, C., Macintyre, H., & Vardoulakis, S. (2017) · Current Environmental Health Reports · doi:10.1007/s40572-017-0150-3 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Disproportionate exposure to urban heat island intensity across major US cities
Hsu, A., Sheriff, G., Chakraborty, T., & Manya, D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22799-5 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Impacts of heat waves and corresponding measures: a review
Zuo, J., Pullen, S., Palmer, J., Bennetts, H., Chileshe, N., & Ma, T. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.078 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Voelkel, J., Hellman, D., Sakuma, R., & Shandas, V. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15040640 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Urban tree canopy has greater cooling effects in socially vulnerable communities in the US
Zhou, W., Huang, G., Pickett, S. T. A., Wang, J., Cadenasso, M. L., McPhearson, T., Grove, J. M., & Wang, J. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.010 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial analysis of urban flooding and extreme heat hazard potential in Portland, OR
Fahy, B., Brenneman, E., Chang, H., & Shandas, V. (2019) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101117 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huang, G., Zhou, W., & Cadenasso, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Ganlin
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1753-1759
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047052831
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Keywords
- urban heat island, land surface temperature, spatial variability, socioeconomic factors, neighborhood poverty, heat vulnerability, tree planting programs, Baltimore, census block groups, land cover
- MeSH terms
- Cities, Environment, Geography, Humans, Maryland, Socioeconomic Factors, Temperature, Heat Stress Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review