Cited by 152Urban Heat Island MitigationEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesUrban Arborization and Environmental Studies

Urban tree canopy has greater cooling effects in socially vulnerable communities in the US

Open access
Zhou, Weiqi, Huang, Ganlin, Pickett, Steward T.A., Wang, Jing, Cadenasso, M.L., McPhearson, Timon, Grove, J. Morgan, Wang, Jia·2021·One Earth

Abstract

Cities are home to around half of the global population but face intensified and unevenly distributed heat stresses. Trees are utilized to adapt to urban heat; however, most tree planting is prioritized by either biophysical or social metrics, rather than an integration of the two. It therefore remains unclear how to maximize ecological and social benefits of tree planting in the context of environmental justice. Here, we analyze social vulnerability to heat and the cooling capacity of trees across 38 of the largest cities in the United States. We find that socially vulnerable people tend to live in hotter neighborhoods with less tree canopy. Furthermore, tree planting in such neighborhoods can achieve greater cooling benefits per unit increase in canopy. Increasing tree cover in these neighborhoods will meet the greatest need for cooling and achieve greater cooling capacity, creating social and ecological co-benefits. Adaptation measures must address both the distributional injustices of urban heat and procedural justice in planning and managing nature-based cooling approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.010

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Historical injustices remain pervasive in the United States with cities marked by large inequalities in access to green amenities, with a major concern about gentrification from "green" redevelopment.

    “Historical injustices remain pervasive in the United States with cities marked by large inequalities in access to green amenities (113, 114), with a major concern about gentrification from “green” redevelopment (115).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, W., Huang, G., Pickett, S. T. A., Wang, J., Cadenasso, M. L., McPhearson, T., Grove, J. M., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • The New School (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Huang, Ganlin
Venue
One Earth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
1764-1775
ISSN
2590-3322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200100473
Cited by
152
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
One Earth (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
Keywords
urban tree canopy, urban heat, social vulnerability, environmental justice, tree planting, cooling capacity, heat stress, nature-based solutions, urban heat adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review