The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Missing marine protected area (MPA) targets: How the push for quantity over quality undermines sustainability and social justice
Abstract
International targets for marine protected areas (MPAs) and networks of MPAs set by the World Summit on Sustainable Development and United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity failed to meet their 2012 deadline and have been extended to 2020. Whilst targets play an important role in building momentum for conservation, they are also responsible for the recent designation of several extremely large no-take MPAs, which pose significant long-term monitoring and enforcement challenges. This paper critically examines the effectiveness of MPA targets, focusing on the underlying risks to achieving Millennium Development Goals posed by the global push for quantity versus quality of MPAs. The observations outlined in this paper have repercussions for international protected area politics with respect to (1) the science-policy interface in environmental decision-making, and (2) social justice concerns in global biodiversity conservation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poor fisheries governance and limited control has led to MPAs that exist on paper only.
“But questions of quantity have predominated over quality, where poor fisheries governance and limited control has led to MPAs that exist on paper only (De Santo 2013).”
From Fluid geographies: marine territorialisation and the scaling up of local aquatic epistemologies on the pacific coast of Colombia (2018) · cites this paper as De Santo 2013
Citations
Cites
Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services
Worm, B., Barbier, E. B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J. E., Folke, C., Halpern, B. S., Jackson, J. B. C., Lotze, H. K., Micheli, F., Palumbi, S. R., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132294 · Cited by 4,544
Towards sustainability in world fisheries.
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guénette, S., Pitcher, T. J., Sumaila, U. R., Walters, C. J., Watson, R., & Zeller, D. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01017 · Cited by 3,019
Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., Fishpool, L. D. C., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02422 · Cited by 1,525
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Agardy, 2003, Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13, 353, 10.1002/aqc.583 · DOI
- Agardy, 2011, Mind the gap: addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning, Marine Policy, 35, 226, 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.006 · DOI
- Blaustein, 2007, Protected areas and equity concerns, Bioscience, 57, 216, 10.1641/B570303 · DOI
- Carr, 2003, Comparing marine and terrestrial ecosystems: implications for the design of coastal marine reserves, Ecological Applications, 13, S90, 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0090:CMATEI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Carr, 2013, Illegal shark fishing in the Galapagos Marine Reserve, Marine Policy, 39, 317, 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.005 · DOI
- Chape, S., Blyth, S., Fish, L., Fox, P., Spalding, M. (compilers), 2003. United Nations List of Protected Areas. IUCN – World Conservation Union and UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Gland Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
- Chape, 2005, Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 443, 10.1098/rstb.2004.1592 · DOI
- De Santo, 2011, Fortress conservation at sea: a commentary on the Chagos marine protected area, Marine Policy, 35, 258, 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.09.004 · DOI
- De Santo, 2011, WikiLeaked cable on Chagos MPA reveals “Fortress” conservation mindset, MPA News, 12
- Gray, 2010, Sea change: exploring the international effort to promote marine protected areas, Conservation and Society, 8, 278, 10.4103/0972-4923.78149 · DOI
- Halpern, 2008, A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems, Science, 319, 948, 10.1126/science.1149345 · DOI · Paper page
- Jessen, 2011, A review of Canada's implementation of the oceans act since 1997 – from leader to follower?, Coastal Management, 39, 20, 10.1080/08920753.2011.544537 · DOI
- Jones, 2001, Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 11, 197, 10.1023/A:1020327007975 · DOI
- Jones, 2009, Equity, justice and power issues raised by no-take marine protected area proposals, Marine Policy, 33, 759, 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.02.009 · DOI
- Locke, 2005, Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm, Environmental Conservation, 32, 1, 10.1017/S0376892905001852 · DOI
- Marine Protected Area (MPA) News, 2010, vol. 11(5)
- Marine Protected Area (MPA) News, 2012, vol. 14(1)
- Myers, 2003, Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities, Science, 423, 280
- Paavola, 2004, Protected areas governance and justice: theory and the European Union's habitats directive, Environmental Sciences, 1, 59, 10.1076/evms.1.1.59.23763 · DOI
- Pala, 2009, Scientists Laud Bush's Blue legacy but want more, Science, 323, 192, 10.1126/science.323.5911.192 · DOI
- Pomeroy, 2008, The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process, Marine Policy, 32, 816, 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017 · DOI
- Pressey, 2003, Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa, Biological Conservation, 112, 99, 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00424-X · DOI
- Roberts, 2001, Designing marine reserve networks. why small, isolated protected areas are not enough, Conservation Magazine, 2
- Rodrigues, 2004, Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected area network, BioScience, 54, 1092, 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1092:GGAPRF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Soulé, 1998, Conservation targets: do they help?, Science, 279, 2060, 10.1126/science.279.5359.2060 · DOI
- Walters, 2000, Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing effort dynamics on efficacy of marine protected areas: how large should protected areas be?, Bulletin of Marine Science, 66, 745
- Ward, H.E., 2010. Creating the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument: Dicourse, Media, Place-making and Policy Entrepreneurs. Unpublished PhD thesis, East Carolina University, Program in Coastal Resources Management.
- Wells, 2007, Towards the 2012 marine protected area targets in eastern Africa, Ocean & Coastal Management, 50, 67, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.08.012 · DOI
- White, 2012, Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 4696, 10.1073/pnas.1114215109 · DOI
- Wood, 2008, Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and action, Oryx, 42, 340, 10.1017/S003060530800046X · DOI
- Wood, 2011, Global marine protection targets: how S.M.A.R.T are they?, Environmental Management, 47, 525, 10.1007/s00267-011-9668-6 · DOI
- Woodroffe, 1998, Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas, Science, 280, 2126, 10.1126/science.280.5372.2126 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Satizábal, P., & Batterbury, S. P. J. (2018) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12199 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- De Santo, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 124
- Pages
- 137-146
- ISSN
- 0301-4797
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review