Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Missing marine protected area (MPA) targets: How the push for quantity over quality undermines sustainability and social justice

De Santo, Elizabeth M.·2013·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

International targets for marine protected areas (MPAs) and networks of MPAs set by the World Summit on Sustainable Development and United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity failed to meet their 2012 deadline and have been extended to 2020. Whilst targets play an important role in building momentum for conservation, they are also responsible for the recent designation of several extremely large no-take MPAs, which pose significant long-term monitoring and enforcement challenges. This paper critically examines the effectiveness of MPA targets, focusing on the underlying risks to achieving Millennium Development Goals posed by the global push for quantity versus quality of MPAs. The observations outlined in this paper have repercussions for international protected area politics with respect to (1) the science-policy interface in environmental decision-making, and (2) social justice concerns in global biodiversity conservation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.033

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Agardy, 2003, Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13, 353, 10.1002/aqc.583 · DOI
  2. Agardy, 2011, Mind the gap: addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning, Marine Policy, 35, 226, 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.006 · DOI
  3. Blaustein, 2007, Protected areas and equity concerns, Bioscience, 57, 216, 10.1641/B570303 · DOI
  4. Carr, 2003, Comparing marine and terrestrial ecosystems: implications for the design of coastal marine reserves, Ecological Applications, 13, S90, 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0090:CMATEI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  5. Carr, 2013, Illegal shark fishing in the Galapagos Marine Reserve, Marine Policy, 39, 317, 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.005 · DOI
  6. Chape, S., Blyth, S., Fish, L., Fox, P., Spalding, M. (compilers), 2003. United Nations List of Protected Areas. IUCN – World Conservation Union and UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Gland Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  7. Chape, 2005, Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 443, 10.1098/rstb.2004.1592 · DOI
  8. De Santo, 2011, Fortress conservation at sea: a commentary on the Chagos marine protected area, Marine Policy, 35, 258, 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.09.004 · DOI
  9. De Santo, 2011, WikiLeaked cable on Chagos MPA reveals “Fortress” conservation mindset, MPA News, 12
  10. Gray, 2010, Sea change: exploring the international effort to promote marine protected areas, Conservation and Society, 8, 278, 10.4103/0972-4923.78149 · DOI
  11. Halpern, 2008, A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems, Science, 319, 948, 10.1126/science.1149345 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Jessen, 2011, A review of Canada's implementation of the oceans act since 1997 – from leader to follower?, Coastal Management, 39, 20, 10.1080/08920753.2011.544537 · DOI
  13. Jones, 2001, Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 11, 197, 10.1023/A:1020327007975 · DOI
  14. Jones, 2009, Equity, justice and power issues raised by no-take marine protected area proposals, Marine Policy, 33, 759, 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.02.009 · DOI
  15. Locke, 2005, Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm, Environmental Conservation, 32, 1, 10.1017/S0376892905001852 · DOI
  16. Marine Protected Area (MPA) News, 2010, vol. 11(5)
  17. Marine Protected Area (MPA) News, 2012, vol. 14(1)
  18. Myers, 2003, Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities, Science, 423, 280
  19. Paavola, 2004, Protected areas governance and justice: theory and the European Union's habitats directive, Environmental Sciences, 1, 59, 10.1076/evms.1.1.59.23763 · DOI
  20. Pala, 2009, Scientists Laud Bush's Blue legacy but want more, Science, 323, 192, 10.1126/science.323.5911.192 · DOI
  21. Pomeroy, 2008, The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process, Marine Policy, 32, 816, 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017 · DOI
  22. Pressey, 2003, Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa, Biological Conservation, 112, 99, 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00424-X · DOI
  23. Roberts, 2001, Designing marine reserve networks. why small, isolated protected areas are not enough, Conservation Magazine, 2
  24. Rodrigues, 2004, Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected area network, BioScience, 54, 1092, 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1092:GGAPRF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  25. Soulé, 1998, Conservation targets: do they help?, Science, 279, 2060, 10.1126/science.279.5359.2060 · DOI
  26. Walters, 2000, Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing effort dynamics on efficacy of marine protected areas: how large should protected areas be?, Bulletin of Marine Science, 66, 745
  27. Ward, H.E., 2010. Creating the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument: Dicourse, Media, Place-making and Policy Entrepreneurs. Unpublished PhD thesis, East Carolina University, Program in Coastal Resources Management.
  28. Wells, 2007, Towards the 2012 marine protected area targets in eastern Africa, Ocean & Coastal Management, 50, 67, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.08.012 · DOI
  29. White, 2012, Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 4696, 10.1073/pnas.1114215109 · DOI
  30. Wood, 2008, Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and action, Oryx, 42, 340, 10.1017/S003060530800046X · DOI
  31. Wood, 2011, Global marine protection targets: how S.M.A.R.T are they?, Environmental Management, 47, 525, 10.1007/s00267-011-9668-6 · DOI
  32. Woodroffe, 1998, Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas, Science, 280, 2126, 10.1126/science.280.5372.2126 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
De Santo, E. M.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
124
Pages
137-146
ISSN
0301-4797
Cited by
209
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review