Unpacking the concept of land degradation neutrality and addressing its operation through the Rio Conventions
Open accessAbstract
The world's commitment towards land degradation neutrality (LDN) became enshrined in various international agreements and decisions throughout the year 2015. The challenge now becomes one of addressing its operation, in order to achieve these new policy goals and targets by the year 2030. Advancing LDN demands attention to what the concept seeks to achieve, as well as unravelling the perspectives of the key multi-lateral environmental agreements through which progress can be made. The three Rio Conventions (the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)) all play key roles in shaping the international LDN governance and implementation context. Their different but related foci create a number of challenges and opportunities for advancing LDN. In this paper we critically analyze the literature to elucidate potential challenges and opportunities in moving LDN towards implementation, considering the mandates and objectives of all three Rio Conventions. We first unpack the concept of LDN's aspirations. We highlight the importance of the definitions and terminology used, and the relationships between those definitions, terms and the actors using them, as well as their implications in framing the range of policy actions and synergies that could benefit progress towards multiple Sustainable Development Goals. We then examine the LDN pilot project spearheaded by the UNCCD to identify key lessons for LDN implementation. Synthesizing these lessons, we present a portfolio of blended interventions that seeks to address the aspirations of the UNCCD, UNFCCC and CBD in the LDN space, identifying synergistic options for national actions to move towards LDN. Overall, our analysis provides insights in advancing LDN from its current position as a policy target, towards synergetic action.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are still limited initiatives to rehabilitate degraded land for biomass production and advanced biofuels, and these are mostly research and demonstration activities.
“The Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807 [173] suggests degraded land as an option to broaden biomass supply, however, there are still limited initiatives to rehabilitate such land types for biomass production and advanced biofuels and these are mostly research and demonstration activities [174][175][176][177][178][179].”
From Advanced biofuels to decarbonise European transport by 2030: markets, challenges, and policies that impact their successful market uptake (2021) · cites this paper as [173]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665 · see citing works
Convention on Biological Diversity
Cropper, A. (1993) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892900023614 · Cited by 2,477 · see citing works
18. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(1993) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110874815-048 · Cited by 2,365 · see citing works
Natural Capital and Sustainable Development
Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x · Cited by 1,652 · see citing works
Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Desertification Synthesis
Adeel, Z., Safriel, U. N., Niemeijer, D., & White, R. (2005) · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Self-citationAronson, J. C., Floret, C., Floc'h, É. L., Ovalle, C., & Pontanier, R. (1993) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.1993.tb00004.x · Cited by 533 · see citing works
RANGELAND DEGRADATION ON THE QINGHAI‐TIBET PLATEAU: IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION
li, X., Gao, J., Brierley, G., Qiao, Y. ‐., Zhang, J., & Yang, Y. (2011) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.1108 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Restoration Ecology to the Future: A Call for New Paradigm
Choi, Y. D. (2007) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.2007.00224.x · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Convention to Combat Desertification
Pittock, J., & Loures, F. R. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203135365-31 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Tropical reforestation and climate change: beyond carbon
Locatelli, B., Catterall, C. P., Imbach, P., Kumar, C., Lasco, R. D., Marín-Spiotta, E., Mercer, B., Powers, J. S., Schwartz, N. B., & Uriarte, M. (2015) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12209 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Tittonell, P. A., Scopel, É., Andrieu, N., Posthumus, H., Mapfumo, P., Corbeels, M., van Halsema, G. E., Lahmar, R., Lugandu, S., Rakotoarisoa, J., et al. (2012) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.011 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Yengoh, G. T., Dent, D., Olsson, L., et al. (2015) · SpringerBriefs in environmental science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24112-8 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Cowie, A., Penman, T. D., Gorissen, L., Winslow, M. D., Lehmann, J. C., Tyrrell, T. D., Twomlow, S. J., Wilkes, A., Lal, R., Jones, J. W., et al. (2011) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.1086 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationChasek, P. S., Safriel, U. N., Shikongo, S. T., & Fuhrman, V. F. (2014) · Journal of Arid Environments · doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.020 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationAdopting novel ecosystems as suitable rehabilitation alternatives for former mine sites
Doley, D., & Audet, P. (2013) · Ecological Processes · doi:10.1186/2192-1709-2-22 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Cowie, A., Schneider, U. A., & Montanarella, L. (2007) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.03.002 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Is Land Degradation Neutrality feasible in dry areas?
Grainger, A. (2014) · Journal of Arid Environments · doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.014 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Development options of natural habitats in a post-mining landscape
Schulz, F., & Wiegleb, G. (2000) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-145x(200003/04)11:2 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Favretto, N., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Dallimer, M., Perkins, J. S., Reed, M. S., Atlhopheng, J., & Mulale, K. (2015) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.005 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationBiomass Productivity-Based Mapping of Global Land Degradation HotspotsPreprint
Le, Q. B., Nkonya, E. M., & Mirzabaev, A. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2465799 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
19. Convention on Biological Diversity
(1993) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110874815-049 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Fertile ground? Options for a science–policy platform for land
Thomas, R. J., Akhtar‐Schuster, M., Stringer, L. C., Marqués, M. J., Escadafal, R., Abraham, E. M., & Enne, G. (2012) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.11.002 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationIvits, É., Cherlet, M., Mehl, W., et al. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.11.010 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Chasek, P. S., Essahli, W., Akhtar‐Schuster, M., Stringer, L. C., & Thomas, R. J. (2011) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.1096 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationClimate analogues: finding tomorrow’s agriculture today
Harvey, B., Ensor, J., Carlile, L., et al. (2012) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Reed, M. S., & Stringer, L. C. (2016) · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationConvention to Combat Desertification
SARNA, S. (2023) · Berkshire Publishing Group eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.9561408.33 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Land-Productivity Dynamics in EuropeTowards Valuation of Land Degradation in the EU
Cherlet, M., Eva, I.-W., Stefan, S., Tóth, G., Arwyn, J., Montanarella, L., & Alan, B. (2013) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/70673 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Caroli, P., 2012. Operationalizing the Zero Net Land Degradation target. In: Bel, S., Gordon-Kirsch, N., Zion-Waldoks, E. (Eds.), Book of Abstracts of the 4th Interna- tional Conference on Drylands, Deserts and Desertification. Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research. Sede Boqer Campus of Ben-Gurion University, Israel, pp. 1-106. Available from: http://in.bgu.ac.il/en/desertification/Site%20Assets/Lists/ List/NewForm/Book_of_Abstracts.pdf. Accessed January 2016.
- Caspari, T., van Lynden, G., Bai, Z., 2015. Land Degradation Neutrality: an Evaluation of Methods. ISRIC-World Soil Information, Wageningen, Netherlands. On behalf of the Federal Environment Agency (Germany), pp. 1-57. Report No. (UBA-FB) 002163/E. Available from: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/ medien/378/publikationen/texte_62_2015_land_degradation_neutrality_0.pdf. Ac- cessed February 2016.
- CBD, 2000. Annex III. Decisions Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Con- vention on Biological Diversity at its Fifth Meeting. Available from: https://www. cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-05/full/cop-05-dec-en.pdf. Accessed February 2016.
- De Leeuw, J., Njenga, M., Wagner, B., Liyama, M. (Eds.), Treesilience: an As- sessment of the Resilience provided by Trees in the Drylands of Eastern Africa. ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 87-91.
- UNCCD, 2013a. In: Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Eleventh Session. Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties at its Eleventh Session. Addendum. Available from: http://www.unccd.int/Lists/OfficialDocuments/cop11/ 23add1eng.pdf. Accessed February 2016.
- UNCCD, 2015c. Outcomes and Policy-oriented Recommendations from the UNCCD 3rd Scientific Conference. Available from: http://www.unccd.int/Lists/ OfficialDocuments/cop12/cst2eng.pdf. Accessed August 2016.
- UNCCD, 2015a. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Twelfth Session. Ad- dendum. (ICCD/COP(12)/20/Add.1). Available from: http://www.unccd.int/Lists/ OfficialDocuments/cop12/20add1eng.pdf. Accessed February 2016.
- UNFCCC, 2010. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Sixteenth Session, Held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. (FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1). Available from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01. pdf#page=4. Accessed February 2016.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960 · see citing works
Panoutsou, C., Germer, S., Karka, P., Papadokostantakis, S., Kroyan, Y., Wojcieszyk, M., Maniatis, K., Marchand, P., & Landalv, I. (2021) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2021.100633 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Ecorestoration for Environmental Sustainability—An Introductory Framework
Banerjee, A., Jhariya, M. K., Bargali, S. S., & Palit, D. (2023) · Ecorestoration for Sustainability · doi:10.1002/9781119879954.ch1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Akhtar-Schuster, M., Stringer, L. C., Erlewein, A., Metternicht, G., Minelli, S., Safriel, U., & Sommer, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (DE)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- European Commission (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Stringer, Lindsay C.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 195
- Issue
- Pt 1
- Pages
- 4-15
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2522486609
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 35.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
- Keywords
- land degradation neutrality, Rio Conventions, UNCCD, UNFCCC, Convention on Biological Diversity, global environmental governance, policy implementation, sustainable land management, land restoration, desertification, Sustainable Development Goals, policy synergy, land rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Pilot Projects, United Nations, Ecosystem, Climate Change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
