Cited by 259Advanced Power Generation TechnologiesNuclear and radioactivity studiesGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nuclear energy: Between global electricity demand, worldwide decarbonisation imperativeness, and planetary environmental implications

Prăvălie, Remus, Bandoc, Georgeta·2018·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

For decades, nuclear energy has been considered an important option for ensuring global energy security, and it has recently started being promoted as a solution for climate change mitigation. However, nuclear power remains highly controversial due to its associated risks - nuclear accidents and problematic radioactive waste management. This review aims to assess the viability of global nuclear energy economically (energy-wise), climatically and environmentally. To this end, the nuclear sector's energy- and climate-related advantages were explored alongside the downsides that mainly relate to radioactive pollution. Economically, it was found that nuclear energy is still an important power source in many countries around the world. Climatically, nuclear power is a low-carbon technology and can therefore be a viable option for the decarbonization of the world's major economies over the following decades, if coupled with other large-scale strategies such as renewable energies. These benefits are however outweighed by the radioactive danger associated to nuclear power plants, either in the context of the nuclear accidents that have already occurred or in that of the large amounts of long-lived nuclear waste that have been growing for decades and that represent a significant environmental and societal threat.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.043

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 257

Metadata

Authors
Prăvălie, R., & Bandoc, G.
Affiliations
University of Bucharest (RO)
Corresponding author
Bandoc, Georgeta
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
209
Pages
81-92
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2782515710
Cited by
259
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Advanced Power Generation Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Nuclear and radioactivity studies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Keywords
nuclear energy, decarbonization, climate change mitigation, energy security, nuclear accidents, nuclear waste management, radioactive contamination, economic feasibility, environmental impact, renewable energy integration
MeSH terms
Conservation of Energy Resources, Electricity, Nuclear Energy, Radioactive Waste, Waste Management, Renewable Energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review