The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic simulation and assessment of the coupling coordination degree of the economy–resource–environment system: Case of Wuhan City in China
Abstract
The environmental and resource issues that accompany rapid economic growth have attracted the attention of the government and the public. Multiple non-linear and complicated interactions exist between the economy, resource and environment subsystem. Accordingly, understanding the operating mechanism of the economy-resource-environment (ERE) system and evaluating its coordination level are of immense significance for sustainable urban development. This study uses system dynamics (SD) to build a dynamic model of the ERE system. Furthermore, a coupling coordination degree model (CCDM) that focuses on the coordination of the ERE system is established using data from 2000 to 2015 for Wuhan City, China. Four typical scenarios (i.e., current, economy, resource and environment scenarios) are designed and simulated by the constructed SD model. Coordination assessment results based on the CCDM show that the coordination of the economy scenario performs the worst, the environment scenario performs best in the short term and the resource scenario is considerably effective for the coordinated development of the urban ERE system in the long term. We suggest that improvements in the energy structure and the natural environment are prior choices for sustainable urban development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901
A Mathematical Theory of Communications
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Cited by 2,080
How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Roubaud, D., & Farhani, S. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050 · Cited by 1,501
Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States
Soytas, U., Sari, R., & Ewing, B. T. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.009 · Cited by 1,321
Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016) · Environmental Development · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002 · Cited by 1,166
Shafiei, S., & Salim, R. A. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064 · Cited by 1,127
The Impact of Pollution on Worker Productivity
Zivin, J. G., & Neidell, M. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.7.3652 · Cited by 1,067
Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries
Arouri, M. E. H., Ben Youssef, A., M'henni, H., & Rault, C. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.042 · Cited by 951
Metadata
- Authors
- Xing, L., Xue, M., & Hu, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 230
- Pages
- 474-487
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898049812
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 41.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic simulation and assessment of the coupling coordination degree of the economy–resource–environment system: Case of Wuhan City in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.065
- The paper
- Xing, L., Xue, M., & Hu, M. (2019). Dynamic simulation and assessment of the coupling coordination degree of the economy–resource–environment system: Case of Wuhan City in China. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.