Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research

Open access
Sauvé, Sébastien, Bernard, Sophie, Sloan, Pamela·2016·Environmental Development
DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The intermeshing of disciplines from the natural sciences, social sciences, engineering and management has become essential to addressing today's environmental challenges. Yet, this can be a daunting task because experts from different disciplines may conceptualize the problems in very different ways and use vocabularies that may not be well understood by one another. This paper explores three alternative environmental concepts used in transdisciplinary research, and outlines some of the epistemological and practical problems that each one poses. It pays particular attention to the increasingly popular concept of “circular economy”, and contrasts it with the more commonly-used concepts of “environmental sciences” and “sustainable development”. In clarifying the nature, meaning and inter-relationship of these alternative concepts, the paper helps trans-disciplinary researchers to understand the opportunities and challenges associated with each one.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Andersen, 2007, An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy, Sustain. Sci., 2, 133, 10.1007/s11625-006-0013-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bartelmus, 2013, The future we want: green growth or sustainable development?, Environ. Dev., 7, 165, 10.1016/j.envdev.2013.04.001 · DOI
  3. Bonciu, 2014, The European economy: from a linear to a circular economy, Romanian J. Eur. Aff., 14, 78
  4. Daly, 1990, Toward some operational principles of sustainable development, Ecol. Econ., 2, 1, 10.1016/0921-8009(90)90010-R · DOI · Paper page
  5. Geng, 2013, Measuring China's circular economy, Science, 339, 1526, 10.1126/science.1227059 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hartwick, 1977, Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources, Am. Econ. Rev., 67, 972
  7. Kajikawa, 2014, Sustainability science: the changing landscape of sustainability research, Sustain. Sci., 9, 431, 10.1007/s11625-014-0244-x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lakoff, 2010, Why it matters how we frame the environment, Environ. Commmun., 4, 70, 10.1080/17524030903529749 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Loewenstein, 2012, Vocabularies and vocabulary structure: a new approach linking categories practices, and institutions, Acad. Manag. Ann., 6, 41, 10.5465/19416520.2012.660763 · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.660763 · Paper page
  10. Mathews, 2011, Progress toward a circular economy in China, J. Ind. Ecol., 15, 435, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00332.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. McDonough, 2003, Peer reviewed: applying the principles of green engineering to cradle-to-cradle design, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 434A, 10.1021/es0326322 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Mebratu, 1998, Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 18, 493, 10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mitcham, 1995, The concept of sustainable development: its origins and ambivalence, Technol. Soc., 17, 311, 10.1016/0160-791X(95)00008-F · DOI · Paper page
  14. Robinson, 2004, Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development, Ecol. Econ., 48, 369, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Schoolman, 2012, How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field, Sustain. Sci., 7, 67, 10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z · DOI · Paper page
  16. Solow, 1993, An almost practical step toward sustainability, Resour. Policy, 19, 162, 10.1016/0301-4207(93)90001-4 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Souza, 2013, Closed-loop supply chains: a critical review, and future research, Decis. Sci., 44, 7, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00394.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Stahel, 1997, The service economy: ‘wealth without resource consumption’?, Philos. Trans. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 355, 1309, 10.1098/rsta.1997.0058 · DOI
  19. UNEP-United Nations Environment Program, 2014, Wealth in the oceans: deep sea mining on the horizon?, Environ. Dev., 12, 50, 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.07.001 · DOI
  20. Zhijun, 2007, Putting a circular economy into practice in China, Sustain. Sci., 2, 95, 10.1007/s11625-006-0018-1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,166

Metadata

Authors
Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P.
Venue
Environmental Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
17
Pages
48-56
ISSN
2211-4645 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
OpenAlex
W1729697543
Cited by
1,166
References
1
FWCI
86.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
The paper
Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.