The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater treatment: Critical review of challenges and opportunities for developing countries
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this paper is to provide guidance in selecting phosphorus recovery options within the municipal wastewater treatment sector regarding developing countries. This critical review includes a brief contextualization of the resource-oriented sanitation paradigm, the discussion of processes for phosphorus recovery based on methods at full-scale, pilot-scale and laboratory-scale, and a concise discussion of the environmental impacts and benefits associated with phosphorus recovery strategies. Finally, the main challenges related to the implementation of resource recovery strategies, especially for phosphorous, were identified and discussed. According to the results, some of the main drivers for phosphorus recovery are the limited availability of phosphorus, increasing cost of phosphate fertilizers and reduction of maintenance costs. Currently, most of the operational processes are based on crystallization or precipitation from the digester supernatant. Struvite is the most common recovered product. The recovery rate of phosphorus from the liquid phase is lower (10-60% from wastewater treatment plant influent), than from sludge (35-70%) and from sludge ashes (70-98%). Phosphorus recovery remains challenging, and some barriers identified were the integration between stakeholders and institutions, public policies and regulations as well as public acceptance and economic feasibility. In developing countries, the implementation of nutrient recovery systems is challenging, because the main concern is on the expansion of sanitation coverage. Resource recovery approaches can provide benefits beyond the wastewater treatment sector, not only improving the sustainability of wastewater treatment operations, but generating revenue for the utility provider.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elser, J., & Bennett, E. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/478029a · Cited by 931
Struvite formation, control and recovery
Doyle, J. D., & Parsons, S. A. (2002) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00126-4 · Cited by 925
Phosphorus Recovery from Wastewater by Struvite Crystallization: A Review
Le Corre, K. S., Valsami-Jones, E., Hobbs, P., & Parsons, S. A. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380701640573 · Cited by 864
Venkata Mohan, S., Nikhil, G. N., Chiranjeevi, P., Nagendranatha Reddy, C., Rohit, M. V., Kumar, A. N., & Sarkar, O. (2016) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.130 · Cited by 811
Global Phosphorus Scarcity and Full-Scale P-Recovery Techniques: A Review
Desmidt, E., Ghyselbrecht, K., Zhang, Y., Pinoy, L., Van der Bruggen, B., Verstraete, W., Rabaey, K., & Meesschaert, B. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2013.866531 · Cited by 737
Total Value of Phosphorus Recovery
Mayer, B. K., Baker, L. A., Boyer, T. H., Drechsel, P., Gifford, M., Hanjra, M. A., Parameswaran, P., Stoltzfus, J., Westerhoff, P., & Rittmann, B. E. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b01239 · Cited by 676
Egle, L., Rechberger, H., Krampe, J., & Zessner, M. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.019 · Cited by 590
Puyol, D., Batstone, D. J., Hülsen, T., Astals, S., Peces, M., & Krömer, J. O. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02106 · Cited by 583
Technologies to Recover Nutrients from Waste Streams: A Critical Review
Mehta, C. M., Khunjar, W. O., Nguyen, V., Tait, S., & Batstone, D. J. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2013.866621 · Cited by 485
World fertilizer trends and outlook to 2022
(2019) · FAO eBooks · doi:10.4060/ca6746en · Cited by 442
Cited by
Removal of phosphate from wastewater by lanthanum modified bio-ceramisite
Liu, M., Wang, C., Guo, J., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.106123 · Cited by 34
Dudek, M., Dębowski, M., Kazimierowicz, J., Zieliński, M., Quattrocelli, P., & Nowicka, A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141912085 · Cited by 25
Improving Phosphorus Use Efficiency in Cropland to Address Phosphorus Challenges by 2050
Zou, T., Zhang, X., & Davidson, E. (2020) · doi:10.1002/essoar.10504095.1 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Chrispim, M. C., Scholz, M., & Nolasco, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 248
- Pages
- 109268
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2957237997
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 18.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater treatment: Critical review of challenges and opportunities for developing countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109268
- The paper
- Chrispim, M. C., Scholz, M., & Nolasco, M. A. (2019). Phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater treatment: Critical review of challenges and opportunities for developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.