The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phosphorus Recovery from Wastewater by Struvite Crystallization: A Review
Abstract
The present review provides an understanding of principles of struvite crystallization and examines the techniques and processes experimented to date by researchers at laboratory, pilot, and fullscale to maximize phosphorus removal and reuse as struvite from wastewater effluents. Struvite is mainly known as a scale deposit causing concerns to wastewater companies. Indeed, struvite naturally occurs under the specific condition of pH and mixing energy in specific areas of wastewater treatment plants (e.g., pipes, heat exchangers) when concentrations of magnesium, phosphate, and ammonium approach an equimolar ratio 1:1:1. However, thanks to struvite composition and its fertilizing properties, the control of its precipitation could contribute to the reduction of phosphorus levels in effluents while simultaneously generate a valuable byproduct. A number of processes such as stirred tank reactors and air-agitated and -fluidized bed reactors have been investigated as possible configurations for struvite recovery. Fluidized bed reactors emerged as one of the promising solutions for removing and recovering phosphorus as struvite. Phosphorus removal can easily reach 70% or more, although the technique still needs improvement with regard to controlling struvite production quality and quantity to become broadly established as a standard treatment for wastewater companies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review
Möller, K., & Müller, T. (2012) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201100085 · Cited by 1,339
Magnesia-based cements: a journey of 150 years, and cements for the future?
Walling, S. A., & Provis, J. L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00463 · Cited by 984
Removal and Recovery of Phosphate From Water Using Sorption
Loganathan, P., Vigneswaran, S., Kandasamy, J., & Bolan, N. S. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2012.741311 · Cited by 678
The Potential Phosphorus Crisis: Resource Conservation and Possible Escape Technologies: A Review
Daneshgar, S., Callegari, A., Capodaglio, A. G., & Vaccari, D. (2018) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources7020037 · Cited by 332
Chrispim, M. C., Scholz, M., & Nolasco, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109268 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Le Corre, K. S., Valsami-Jones, E., Hobbs, P., & Parsons, S. A.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 433-477
- ISSN
- 1064-3389 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2142171308
- Cited by
- 864
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus Recovery from Wastewater by Struvite Crystallization: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10643380701640573
- The paper
- Le Corre, K. S., Valsami-Jones, E., Hobbs, P., & Parsons, S. A. (2009). Phosphorus Recovery from Wastewater by Struvite Crystallization: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380701640573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.