Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding the molecular mechanisms for the enhanced phytoremediation of heavy metals through plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A review

Manoj, Srinivas Ravi, Karthik, Chinnannan, Kadirvelu, Krishna, Arulselvi, Padikasan Indra, Shanmugasundaram, Thangavel, Bruno, Benedict, Rajkumar, Mani·2020·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Rapid industrialization, modern agricultural practices and other anthropogenic activities add a significant quantity of toxic heavy metals into the environment, which induces severe toxic effects on all form of living organisms, alter the soil properties and its biological activity. Remediation of heavy metal contaminated sites has become an urgent necessity. Among the existing strategies, phytoremediation is an eco-friendly and much convincing tool for the remediation of heavy metals. However, the applicability of phytoremediation in contaminated sites is restricted by two prime factors such as i) slow growth rate at higher metal contaminated sites and ii) metal bioavailability. This circumstance could be minimized and accelerate the phytoremediation efficiency by incorporating the potential plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) as a combined approach. PGPR inoculation might improve the plant growth through the production of plant growth promoting substances and improve the heavy metal remediation efficiency by the secretion of chelating agents, acidification and redox changes. Moreover, rhizobacterial inoculation consolidates the metal tolerance and uptake by regulating the expression of various metal transporters, tolerant and metal chelator genes. However, the exact underlying molecular mechanism of PGPR mediated plant growth promotion and phytoremediation of heavy metals is poorly understood. Thus, the present review provides clear information about the molecular mechanisms excreted by PGPR strains in plant growth promotion and phytoremediation of heavy metals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109779

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
Manoj, S. R., Karthik, C., Kadirvelu, K., Arulselvi, P. I., Shanmugasundaram, T., Bruno, B., & Rajkumar, M.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
254
Pages
109779
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2985188727
Cited by
456
References
4
FWCI
28.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the molecular mechanisms for the enhanced phytoremediation of heavy metals through plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109779
The paper
Manoj, S. R., Karthik, C., Kadirvelu, K., Arulselvi, P. I., Shanmugasundaram, T., Bruno, B., & Rajkumar, M. (2020). Understanding the molecular mechanisms for the enhanced phytoremediation of heavy metals through plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A review. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109779

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.