Cited by 4Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesSoil erosion and sediment transport

Cross-scale controls on the in-stream dynamics of nitrate and turbidity in semiarid agricultural waterway networks

Open access
Webster, Alex J., Cadenasso, Mary L.·2020·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Stream and riparian zone networks embedded in agricultural landscapes provide a potential intervention point to ameliorate the negative effects of agricultural runoff by reducing transport of nitrate (NO 3-) and suspended sediments (SS) downstream. However, our ability to support and promote NO 3- and SS attenuation is limited by our understanding of vegetative and hydrogeomorphic controls in realistic management contexts. In addition, agricultural landscapes are heterogenous on multiple management scales, from farm field to regional water management scales, and the effect of these heterogeneities and how they interact across scales to affect vegetative and hydrogeomorphic controls is poorly explored in many settings. This is especially true in irrigated agricultural settings, where stream and riparian networks are entwined with and sensitive to water management systems. To fill these gaps, we related the vegetative and hydrogeomorphic features of 67 waterway reaches across two water management districts in the California Central Valley to reach-scale NO 3- and turbidity attenuation and district-scale water quality patterns. We found that in-stream NO 3- attenuation was rare, but, when it did occur, it was promoted by shallow and wide riparian banks, low flows, and high channel-edge denitrification potential. Nitrate concentrations were consistently higher in upstream reaches compared to water district outlets, suggesting that while exports from the district were low, agricultural runoff may impair within-district water resources. Turbidity attenuation was highly variable and unrelated to vegetative or hydrogeomorphic features, suggesting that onfield controls are crucial to managing suspended sediments. We conclude that waterway networks have the potential to mitigate the effects of agricultural NO 3- runoff in this setting, but that more effective monitoring and adoption of NO 3- attenuating features is needed. Using our findings, we make specific management and monitoring recommendations at both reach and water district scales.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110307

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Habitat quality and biodiversity value of ditches is heavily dependent on management regimes.

    “However, habitat quality and the biodiversity value of ditches is heavily dependent on management regimes 134,200 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [134]

  • Eutrophication effects are especially common in drainage ditches because they often serve as headwaters that receive anthropogenic terrestrial nutrient loads first before transferring them to receiving waters, including rivers, wetlands, lakes, seas, and groundwater.

    “These eutrophication effects are especially common in drainage ditches 132 because they often serve as headwaters that receive anthropogenic terrestrial nutrient loads first before transferring them to receiving waters, including, rivers, wetlands, lakes, seas 133 , and groundwater 134 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [134]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webster, A. J., & Cadenasso, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Webster, Alex J.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
262
Pages
110307
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008781204
Cited by
4
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
nitrate attenuation, agricultural runoff, riparian buffers, suspended sediment, river networks, waterway network, irrigated agriculture, water management districts, semi-arid agriculture, Central Valley, water quality monitoring
MeSH terms
Agriculture, California, Environmental Monitoring, Nitrates, Nitrogen Oxides, Water Supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review