The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries
Abstract
In all countries, the priority of policymakers is to reduce carbon emissions without reducing economic growth performance. Progress in innovation is one of the main measures that can be used to reduce carbon emissions. It is important to demonstrate the impact of innovation at the sectoral level, in terms of more realistic data on policy measures. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of innovation on carbon emissions on a sectorial basis for fourteen countries in the G20, for the period between 1991 and 2017. The selected countries are Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mexico, South Africa, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States for which data is available. The results show that the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis is invalid and, in the long-term, innovations did not have a statistically significant effect on the energy sector, transport sector, and other sectors. It was also found that while an increase in innovation in the industrial sector leads to a reduction in carbon emissions, an increase in innovation in the construction sector increases carbon emissions. Therefore, it can be recommended that, in addition to national policies to reduce CO2 emissions, specific policies should be implemented for each sector separately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors
Pedroni, P. (1999) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14 · Cited by 6,726
Cited by
Carbon neutrality, bank lending, and credit risk: Evidence from the Eurozone
Umar, M., Ji, X., Mirza, N., & Naqvi, B. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113156 · Cited by 322
Cheng, Y., Sinha, A., Ghosh, V., Sengupta, T., & Luo, H. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112957 · Cited by 177
lin, J., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Hasnaoui, A. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113460 · Cited by 112
Efthymiou, L., Kulshrestha, A., & Kulshrestha, S. (2023) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci13070165 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Erdoğan, S., Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, D. Ç., & Gedikli, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 267
- Pages
- 110637
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3020611170
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 44.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637
- The paper
- Erdoğan, S., Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, D. Ç., & Gedikli, A. (2020). The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.