The DOI matches its Crossref record; 222 of the 223 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Greenhouse gas emissions from inorganic and organic fertilizer production and use: A review of emission factors and their variability
Abstract
Fertilizers have become an essential part of our global food supply chain and are necessary to sustain our growing population. However, fertilizers can also contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, along with other potential nutrient losses in the environment, e.g. through leaching. To reduce this environmental impact, tools such as life cycle assessments and decision support systems are being used to aid in selecting sustainable fertilization scenarios. These scenarios often include organic waste-derived amendments, such as manures, composts and digestates. To produce an accurate assessment and comparison of potential fertilization scenarios, these tools require emission factors (EFs) that are used to estimate GHG emissions and that are an integral part of these analyses. However, such EFs seem to be very variable in nature, thereby often resulting in high uncertainty on the outcomes of the analyses. This review aims to identify ranges and sources of variability in EFs to provide a better understanding of the potential uncertainty on the outcomes, as well as to provide recommendations for selecting EFs for future studies. As such, an extensive review of the literature on GHG emissions from production, storage, transportation and application of synthetic fertilizers (N, P, K), composts, digestates and manures was performed. This paper highlights the high variability that is present in emissions data and confirms the great impact of this uncertainty on the quality and validity of GHG predictions related to fertilizers. Variability in EFs stem from the energy source used for production, operating conditions, storage systems, crop and soil type, soil nutrient content, amount and method of fertilizer application, soil bacterial community, irrigation method, among others. Furthermore, a knowledge gap exists related to EFs for potassium fertilizers and waste valorization (anaerobic digestion/composting) processes. Overall, based on this review, it is recommended to determine EFs on a case by case basis when possible and to use uncertainty analyses as a tool to better understand the impact of EF variability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and eutrophication of the water environment (Walling and Vaneeckhaute 2020;Liu et al. 2021).”
From Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Walling and Vaneeckhaute 2020
Citations
Cites
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108 · Cited by 7,692
HUMAN ALTERATION OF THE GLOBAL NITROGEN CYCLE: SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES
Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W., Likens, G. E., Matson, P. A., Schindler, D. W., Schlesinger, W. H., & Tilman, D. G. (1997) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0737:haotgn]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 5,604
How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world
Erisman, J. W., Sutton, M. A., Galloway, J. N., Klimont, Z., & Winiwarter, W. (2008) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo325 · Cited by 4,630
Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls?
Butterbach‐Bahl, K., Baggs, E. M., Dannenmann, M., Kiese, R., & Zechmeister‐Boltenstern, S. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0122 · Cited by 3,085
Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021 · Cited by 1,531
Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane
Ryckebosch, E., Drouillon, M., & Vervaeren, H. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033 · Cited by 1,429
Montoya, J. H., Tsai, C., Vojvodic, A., & Nørskov, J. K. (2015) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201500322 · Cited by 1,384
Bridgham, S. D., Cadillo‐Quiroz, H., Keller, J. K., & Zhuang, Q. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12131 · Cited by 1,321
Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—A review
Oertel, C., Matschullat, J., Zurba, K., Zimmermann, F., & Erasmi, S. (2016) · Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2016.04.002 · Cited by 1,315
A global high‐resolution emission inventory for ammonia
Bouwman, L., Lee, D. S., Asman, W. A. H., Dentener, F. J., van der Hoek, K. W., & Olivier, J. G. J. (1997) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/97gb02266 · Cited by 1,266
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Menegat, S., Ledo, A., & Tirado, R. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18773-w · Cited by 563
McLaughlin, H., Littlefield, A. A., Menefee, M., Kinzer, A., Hull, T. C., Sovacool, B. K., Bazilian, M., Kim, J., & Griffiths, S. (2023) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113215 · Cited by 489
Peng, X., Jiang, Y., Chen, Z., Osman, A. I., Farghali, M., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01551-5 · Cited by 333
“Industrial waste for natural resource conservation Due to global water shortages caused by climate change, treating contaminated water sources has become a scorching topic (Wang and Yang 2016).”
BackgroundKhan, A., López-Maldonado, E. A., Khan, N., Villarreal-Gómez, L., Munshi, F. M., Alsabhan, A., & Perveen, K. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133088 · Cited by 227
Nitrogenous fertilizers: impact on environment sustainability, mitigation strategies, and challenges
Tyagi, J., Ahmad, S., & Malik, M. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-022-04027-9 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Vaneeckhaute, Céline
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 276
- Pages
- 111211
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3089098032
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 223
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- NSERC Collaborative Research and Development (CRDPJ/509167–2017)
- NSERC (RGPIN-2017-04838)
- FRQNT (138536)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- greenhouse gas emissions, emission factors, fertilizer production, organic fertilizer, mineral fertilizers, manure, compost, digestate, nitrogen fertilization, phosphorus fertilizer, potassium fertilizer, uncertainty analysis, life cycle assessment, anaerobic digestion, composting, fertilizer application methods
- MeSH terms
- Greenhouse Gases, Agriculture, Fertilizers, Manure, Nitrogen, Soil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
